Mcjrpc
See Page 5 of the summary. Has this been superseded? https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5959/1896534.pdf
That's interesting Michael I wasn't even aware of it. However more reading up leads me to wonder if the issue of predetermination has been modified: http://www.localism-agenda.com/2012/01/abolishing-predetermination-what-it-really-means/
But if they're not pro Richard's cause, wouldn't that be good for him - fewer votes against him? Or maybe this clause would be relevant to obtaining a dispensation to vote: without the dispensation the representation of different political groups dealing with that business would be so upset as to alter the likely outcome of any vote,
Well it would be very noble if she did but unless she's been banging the drum for Mr Weeks I wouldn't hold it against her if she doesn't. It's surely not her fault that a planning dispute coincides with where the family caravan is kept. Has she voiced an opinion on it previously?
She declared her interest as rental of land for a family caravan. Maybe if she feels strongly for Mr Weeks' plight she'll move it!
I don't know Lynne but I found this: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240134/Openness_and_transparency_on_personal_interests.pdf Sounds like she has no input on this vote unless she gets a dispensation. Are you thinking it diminishes the value of voting for her if that's a priority issue?
Except they don't see it as a mistake, it was a vote winner for them and to hell with the consequences for those most in need of housing down the line. I just hope no one is fooled by it this time.
More to the point Webmaster look at who reported it in the first place. They're as much of your problem as Mrs C.
SoD - it's comments like that that would deter me from voting tactically for the Lib Dems. Up your game.
Many congratulations Michael and Bob. Will you be using the Carnival float for your nuptials?
