OurSoul
That's true Lynne. However why they would be at the Dawlish Warren outer car park is anyone's guess, unless they had some sort of mobility assistance to get them to the sea front. My point still stands though re the odious suggestion of sacking hardworking people just in order to save the loos - there has to be a better solution to the challenge. In the meantime, good luck to those challenging ...
With regard to your opinion about long-term savings of redundancies, the point is that ALLEMS wanted redundancies in order to keep those loos open. In other words he wanted people to lose their jobs to save people having to walk 100 yards - what an unpleasant person. He wanted a short-term solution to this challenge; making people redundant, in my opinion, isn't the solution. If you feel no ...
Well that didn't last long. Some people can't help themselves. I apologise to everyone else on behalf of Burneside, who clearly doesn't think that posts on here should be constructive. Hey-ho.
Our reflect. Do you not realise how much redundancy costs as well? A quick Google - 2010/11 and 2011/12 financial years - 11 were made redundant at a total cost of £135K. And it's got worse since then!! So, if we were to use your logic and make even more redundant, then the £152K savings from doing what they've done to the outer car park loos would pale into insignificance I'm afraid as ...
Exactly, Huw. Thank you.
Burneside. I've already previously stated that I've had to re-register twice through no choice of my own. Thanks for your contribution yet again.
I rest my case.
What happens is that informative threads such as this one get hijacked by haters. It's a sad reflection on them, but there you go. A troll is someone who tries to get a reaction out of others without adding any value to a thread - I think it's clear for all to see which sister and brother double act was doing that late on Friday night...
Maybe it's because the tendering process was for half of the building to become the cycle hire outlet? Maybe it's not too expensive to recommission the remaining half?
http://m.teignbridge.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=44559&p=0 "The outcome of the tendering process is due shortly."
