Discussion
How do you know that three men agreed with me, or is that just your usual arrogance thinking you know it all? In the 70s & 80s both parties in sexual assault trials were granted anonymity, I can see no earthly reason why that law was scrapped. When it comes to judicial matters men are second class citizens, but then that suits the feminazis.
Thanks Leatash, that was exactly the point I was making to “Calamari”. I assume that Burneside (and the 3 blokes who agree with his comment) also believes that alleged murderers/paedophiles/terrorists should also remain anonymous until a judge or jury finds them guilty??
@leatash - completely agree. i can't imagine having to do that and know that i wouldn't be able to.
From that link above "In Dawlish, £4.2million will support the delivery of a new bridge and a new section of a link road. It will provide a high-quality link to community facilities at either end for residents."
Millions of pounds of road and footpath developments are being invested into Devon. In Exeter £3.7million will be spent for the delivery and on-going management of two Suitable Alternative Natural Green Space (SANGS) countryside parks - Dawlish SANGS and Exeter SANGS. This will unlock more than 17,000 new homes and complies with a requirement of National and European Law that could stifle all ...
One thing we do know, if a man had actually been charged then his identity would have been plastered across the media, even before any guilt had been established.
A lot of rape victims withdraw there statements as the thought of a pending court case and facing there attacker is to daunting.
Seems like the usual suspects are wrong yet again. Teignbridge councillors have rejected the request from the external body.
And yet the government has allowed hundreds of terrorists to return to the UK and disappear back into the community. More terrorists incidents waiting to happen. It beggars belief. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/isis-british-jihadis-return-uk-iraq-syria-report-islamic-state-fighters-europe-threat-debate-terror-a8017811.html
This time? You mean, “again”. Seems like you’re suggesting that those innocent people attending their place of worship deserved to be killed by the lunatic. You do realise when you post such rubbish in public that people know who you really are?