Nelson
@Daverc the "alleged" crimes refer to the persons seeking to adopt a child. The reason why, in my opinion, this information is actually relevant, is because social services should be allowed to defer a decision until after the "alleged" crimes have been proven or disproven in a court of law. It should be recorded and held on file until that point in time only. Imagine the uproar in the ...
An interesting link Lynne. My immediate reaction is to question why references to "alleged" criminal offences should not be included in adoption paperwork? Surely it should be? It's the social worker I feel sorry for.
No trains from Dawlish again. Time for plan B to get to work again!
I give up. User 4549 is right. I surrender.
What a freak you are. LOLOLOL. They'll be putting a restraining order on you!!!!!
You're Christmas Crackers pal! Have you heard of Google Alerts? Do you know how Facebook works? Do you know people change their profile pics all the time? You've already been proven, by the Webmaster no less, to be miles wide of the mark with your attempts to put 2 and 2 together - keep it up laughing boy.
It's not free! Every spurious FOI request costs us taxpayers money. Eg requests complaining about signs requesting bus drivers to switch off their engines when parked up. I can't believe that Pete and Marty are in favour of the Dawlish public being forced to breathe in fumes from parked up buses. What this has got to do with User4549 though, Lord only knows.
Shame about the druggies. Hope the Queen St dealer gets put away for years.
You might be better off asking the Chuckle Brothers, Pete and Marty. Or you could waste taxpayers money on an FOI request.
I'd definitely have voted for you.