The thread that Roy started, "Looney Toon Peter Harry at it again" goes on to say:- "I see in today's Herald Express that regular law-breaker Peter Harry has once again cost the law-abiding taxpayers a fortune. I bet the codger is dead proud of himself." What evidence did he have that Peter Harry had broken any law? I think Roy, as is FEL-699 are very dangerous people - who if they know nothing ...
Believing FEL-699 and Roy is really laughable. I sometimes wonder what planet they are from or what drugs they have in their locker. There is only one person who knows exactly what went on and that is Peter Harry. Unless the two very vociferous chatter boxes can produce the evidence to back up their claims then that may well be the reason why others have only looked but not commented on this ...
I do not suppose for one minute Don Pearson, that Roy or Fel 699 will understand a teeny witsy bitsy bit of it.
Only because the lib dems have been selling the family silver, and they ripped off Wally to the tune of £20,000 for a postage size piece of land. And as TDC valuer admits, it was equivalant to £250,000 a acre. That is what I call well done TDC.
Now Roy is really confused. Oh Dear! Where does he get the idea that Peter Harry is viaduct. Peter Harry who went under the psuedo of rainbow, has not replied to this board for a very long time, and that is a fact.
FEL-699, we are a gnats whisker away from becoming (If we are not already there) a dictatorship. Would you sit back and accept an accusation leveled against you or would you go after those that accused you with the view to getting it put right? It is because of silly people like yourself and Roy (although I think Roy is more of a wind up merchant which has lost the brain he was born with and found ...
Did Roy read the article himself or through his obvious lack of intelligence have it read to him? I suspect the latter, because I like many others know what a complete and utter dipstick he is. Roy still thinks the world is flat.
Here is my reply boyo and Dawlishdame..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................nothing to report. Of course the police are interested - it's ...
how do you know it is not a chinese whisper DAWLISHDAME? What evidence do you have apart from someone saying, "a young girl was shown images from a mobile phone." Go along to a court of law and listen to some of the cases where someone claimed they were raped, shown images of indecent images, didn't do it, it wasn,t me, they told me, etc,etc, and then tell me that scaremongering is not part of ...
There is the law or no law, an offence or no offence. It would serve FEL-699 better if it would care to ask his local snout-in-the-trough councilor, (yes they are at it as well) why is it that those that are gainfully employed on the back of our taxes, can get things oh so wrong at our expense and expect to get away with it. If the law says something must be done (the word must is mandatory by ...