This site uses cookies

General Discussion

Posts on General Discussion

@1263 I wasn't branding everyone a racist. I was referring to Anne-Marie Morris. I didn't know you were such an admirer of Morris. Do you see her a champion of free speech? Do you think her 'n*****r in the woodpile' comment in a parliamentary debate was simply an acceptable and different viewpoint? I just don't think it's newsworthy. Morris joins Reform, so what? It's probably where she ...

1263
1263
2 weeks ago

@dac Your headline  "Racist joins Racist Party "  sadly falls into the usual claptrap about branding eveyone who has different views as racist. This is a tired old cliche  used by opponents of free speech to try and gag/smear people with differing views. Its really not worthy of you.

Racist joins racist party... Wrigley will be worried if the Tories and Reform form an electoral pact. If not he may benefit from the right being split again in 4 years. It also depends if Labour and the Lib Dems form their own unofficial pact again and he benefits from tactical voters. I'd hope people vote tactically to oust him in 4 years time given he's just in it for himself. Actually ...

Steve
Steve
2 weeks ago

Reform supporters probably are.

1263
1263
2 weeks ago

Should wrigley be worried.? Discuss......

@b.o.liking Can you expand on that. What do you take issue with about the Chagos deal? Do you think it should be decolonized? Do you think Chagossians living in Mauritius, Seychelles and W. Sussex should be allowed to return to their homeland? Closer links with neighbouring countries in the EU in itself isn't illegal. Could you be more specific?

b.o.liking
b.o.liking
3 weeks ago

i would say closer links to our nearest and dearest EU. so called friends   the Chagos deal for example. It could be that more alleged  odd happenings will come to light?

@b.o.liking Could you be more specific? Which deals in particular?

b.o.liking
b.o.liking
3 weeks ago

if our glorious leader keeps as alleged doing deals with the E U and as i understand the law lords keep ruling this is illegal and find there no authority for this labour gov. to proceed. It could be alleged not for the first time our leader and his cabinet are in breach of previous rulings by the Lord Chief Justice. I would think there must be some form illegality for going against ...

@Paul I wasn't debating right and wrong. Animal welfare is secondary to profit, whether animals are bred for food or for sports. Livestock farming also has a negative environmental impact. Growth hormones and anti-biotics, coupled with cases of contamination where meats are basically marinated in faecal matter post slaughter means the welfare of those eating these 'animal products'  isn't a ...