General Discussion
That's it then, the money for the wood louse is not forthcoming and never will be, and despite what Vickery's imagination tells him, the majority of consultation respondents did NOT want it blighting the lawn. Yet again his pipe dream has gone up in smoke. It's just as well that Vickery has publicly stated he is unlikely to stand for re-election next year because after this fiasco it is highly ...
@Lindapetherick You have no knowledge of my present domestic arrangements and therefore are totally unqualified to make the comment you posted earlier. I suggest you pause and think before opening your mouth in the future.
Vickery, you have wasted £23,000!
And plenty of people don't like the plans, 56% to be precise.
I'm not a lawyer Mrs C, hence I won't risk repeating potential libel in public.
@Mrs C I have no intention of repeating your remarks on this thread, could be potential libel.
I saw the original vile and disgusting post before Mrs C removed it the next morning, and 100% agree with Margaret Swift.
@Mcjrpc Did you actually see the post from Mrs C/Judith Chalmers before she swiftly pulled it down? I think the owners of Red Rock cafe have a strong case should they wish to pursue it.
@Mrs C/Judith Chalmers If you believe your original post was legitimate why did you then remove it so quickly? Thankfully a screenshot was taken which can be used in the future if necessary. I am so pleased the owners of Red Rock cafe have received front page publicity in the Gazette on their reopening.
It's bloody amazing how savings were conveniently found from other areas of the council budget to pay for the groundwork on this doomed proposal, yet essential services like public toilets are still under threat.