General Discussion
Good! But there maybe problems with traffic looking for alterative route. Elmgrove to Gatehouse, through the lanes and come out at the lower end of Port Road maybe.
Lisa is back again, so perhaps lisa could explain where plod has not. HOW CAN YOU ENFORCE OFF STREET CAR PARKS WHICH ARE PAY AND DISPLAY OWNED BY A LA? IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT IS SAID IN THE TMA 2004. HOW DO YOU DO IT? THAT IS THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM -----------------HOW DO YOU DO IT?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/3187928/Milk-imports-surge-as-British-production-drops-to-30-year-low.html
I will also add that there is strong talk to stop using ANPR/CCTV for buslane/gate enforcement. it is to do with it costing LA's to much money and the DVLA are involved, As you are so good regarding ANPR and it's use, perhaps you can explain why ANPR/CCTV is not such a good idea to enforce using those approved devices.
And I have asked you consistently, to explain to me and others how it would be possible to use that certified device for enforcement purposes in OFF STREET P&D car parks, owned by a LA So far all you have demonstrated with others backing you, is that you are right that ANPR CAN BE USED in off street P&D car parks owned by a LA Until you can do that, all that you have placed on this site is a ...
You silly people, if you want to know something, ASK! Years ago when I had the privilege of working with a renowned Judge, before he became a judge. He told me and I have never forgotten it. YOU DO NOT ASK A QUESTION, UNLESS YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER. It has stood me in good stead and it has enabled me to put down many LA officers. Some have taken early retirement (with or without a golden ...
plod, you are getting clever in taking others around in circles, but in a thread you poasted earlier " Bournemouth Borough Council has an ANPR "approved device" that can be used for parking enforcement under the Traffic Management Act 2004. The approved device certificate number is PADM 058. The device is currently used to enforce bus stops and school keep clear markings. There is no law that ...
Once again plod is wrong., this is how it works. You go into a car park in the City of Exeter, you opt to pay by phone. The tarriff charge is £2 and that is all you pay, you do not pay a convenience charge for the service. The company that operates this service, will then invoice ECC for the number of people that used that service. If the tarriff is £2 then that is what will be shown on the ...
Just noticed on a machine in a Teignbridge owned off street car park, that there is a 20p convenience charge. Anyone know why Teighbridge charge double what Exeter charges for the same service. And does anyone know whether or not, Teignbridge absorb the charge.
Right from the horses mouth. I have just found out the the 10p charged in Exeter for the use of ringo or pay by phone, is absorbed by Exeter City Council. So anyone that has found they have been charged 10p in any of Exeter City Council off street car parks when the have used the ringo or pay by phone service shouldn't have been. Someone has called it a "convenience fee", but that convenience ...
