Dawlish News
@Clive - i queried the report's absence on the last day of june. got told that a report will be going to the dept of transport the end of this week. that's all i know. (except that i had been told some weeks back, via grapevine, that nr were only going through the 'let's look at the alternative/additional options' scenario in order to keep lots of south west mps happy. financially these other ...
Yes Roberta I agree with what you say. I was just trying to find a compromise situation (engineering approval allowing) between public access/privacy/and storm resilience. But if no compromise is possible then I think all would agree that storm resilience is number one priority. I think most would then see it closely followed by the need for public access for all along the walkway. Perhaps NR ...
Actually RV I had also been thinking about wheel chair users etc and had thought to myself that should NR/the engineers agree that the Sea Lawn Terrace/Riviera Terrace part of the walkway could be a bit lower than the rest of it then the lower bit needs to be accessed via a slope. Definitely not steps.
okay try this step by step approach. 1. Do a search on www.marinemanagement.org.uk/publicregister 2. Click on Marine Case Management System 3.Click on South Western 4.Scroll down until you find case ref: MLA/2014/00220 (it is about three-quarters of the way down the page). 5. Go to right hand side and click on View Application 6. Just scroll down a little bit and Bingo! (or ...
I've just tried that link I posted on here a couple of days ago. Not working now for some reason. Not easy to find on the info on the Marine Management website. Here it is again. https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmo/fox?thread_id=e2kfdx6_dtoEjVpal&app_mnem=live&xfsessionid=sid_e2kfbEL_dtoEjVpal (and I've just clicked on it and it takes me straight to the info concerning ...
Surely the primary purpose of the repairs is to protect the rail line. Now, I'm not an engineer but........surely it follows that if the rail line is given greater protection than so will the properties located behind it. And whilst I appreciate there is a potential invasion of privacy issue I would have thought that protection from the sea would be the issue of primary importance by all those ...
There is a quarter page ad in this week's Dawlish Post (see bottom page 74) concerning the proposed works. I've followed the links on the website shown in the ad and this link should take you straight to what is being proposed. https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmo/fox?thread_id=e2bIyMh_dtoEjVpal&app_mnem=live&xfsessionid=sid_e2bIyj2_dtoEjVpal
BBC Spotlight South West are featuring this story today. Was shown this lunchtime and should be on again this evening on BBC1 after the national news.
and talking of budgets. Have a read of this http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/MPs-say-transport-8216-inequality-8217-hurting/story-21176498-detail/story.html and this http://www.51m.co.uk/south-west-wont-even-get-hs2-hand-me-downs-rail-boss-told/
Well I feel sure I am not the only one to have been making noises both publicly and privately for the need for any long term resilience work, whether sea wall improvement or breakwater or both, to have secondary functions aiding the tourist economy as well as the primary function of protection the railway from the sea.
