General Discussion
Why has the speaker of the house not intervened to point out the present government has brought parliament in to disrepute and a bloody joke. On a slightly different subject why does the media send reporters to these great speeches by our leaders in government of intent when they are a complete and utter load of B.S.
if anyone humiliates our glorious leader or embarrass him with a petition, he immediately seeks revenge by promoting an utter waster in sadiq khan just to pi -- everyone off. like a tempestuous child that he is.
Again I don't understand. How an unqualified "economist" can find twenty plus million pounds. Even more disturbing how in 4 Months she has sorted out and put the country back on a more even footing. Have to say all the other economist have been pulling the wool over our eyes.My own opinion is it's dead easy job and money for old rope.Are we so bloody lucky or are we being taken in? AGAIN.
does anyone have in mind who could be the the next archbishop to take over from Welby. As the latest trend is to embelish your CV. So if an ex Anglican Priest out there is available please forward your application to lambeth palace.PS. Not by mail.
it reminds me of my dim history lessons of the land clearances in Scotland and northern England. It could be thought a very rich person could increase his/her farm land portfolio. Anyone out there any ideas who that could be.
If as alleged our chancellor of the exchequer is not a bona fide economist as claimed as written on her CV then should any policy she seeks to make also be legal ? or otherwise
it seems one of our ex prime ministers alleges we are to get free energy. if my memory serves a previous minister around the time of labours wilson govt. said the same when we started drilling for oil in the North sea.Happy days.Yippee.But when the barrels were coming ashore It was announced this type of oil to be specific was not type for the use of making petrol. surprise ...
will our royal family be paying any inheritance tax to the coffers or has a special case been done for them by mr. starmer? Well i'm only asking. After all the words of transparency and openness are much banded about.
i will bite to the two above, scum maybe lack of medication maybe.Have been called worse. My opinion not Angela Raynors.
it might be said and he is not the first.BUT me thinks he wanted the keys to number ten so badly. to the point the conservatives aided and abetted his ambitions But the question not asked was he good or clever enough like most of his flunkies to do the job? Me thinks as it stands manifestos and there lies mean absolutely nothing so should a new election be run?
