General Discussion
A problem for who? Not for me.
Plod explained what it could be used for in his first post on 6th Jan. Plod don't waste any more of your time on this. No one else is.
So it is agreed I did not criticise. As for an "air" that he was not doing the right thing, well that is your interpretation and not something I have control over. Upseting the wrong people? That would be wrong though wouldn't it? Surely the aim is to upset the right people so that they review the amount of packaging used. I don't think what leatash does is wrong. I am sceptical though that ...
Excuse me majorp but where did I criticise leatash? I said his or her stance is worthy. That's not criticism. I did add something to help resolve the problem. I suggested lobbying those with the power to change things. While I don't disagree with leatash's actions, I'm not convinced that alone will get the result he or she wants. It is the supermarket fat cats that make these kind of decisions and ...
Supermarkets generally don't sort their rubbish Leatash. Cardboard goes in a baler and foodwaste, plastic etc all gets thrown in the same big wheely bin that is taken away by a private company. The plastic you leave behind will most likely end up in landfill but if you took it home you could ensure that as much of your plastic as possible is recycled. Your stance is worthy but I think lobbying ...
Nonsense majorp. plod has been consistent throughout and competently qualified his view point with rationale and supporting links. You on the other hand have flip flopped, lacked clarity and provided no supporting links. Anyone who has challenged you on your view point about ANPR or ticket transferbility has been insulted which is probably why no one else wants to contribute to this. You've just ...
Majorp I'm not saying they currently have an approved ANPR device to use. I'm saying they could get one and use it to enforce off street car parks. plod knows this subject far bettter than I and here is the written advice he gave me. The guidance quoted is not complete. It is missing where it directs you to a footnote which in turn directs you to this amending legislation. ...
ANPR can be used for on and off street parking enforcement so long as the device used meets the technical requirements set by statute. It's not correct to say councils cannot enforce car parks using ANPR. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/3486/schedule/made
There is nothing to stop them getting one like this one plod gave as an example. https://www.sea.co.uk/transport/products/roadflow-flexi/
@majorp -----------as pointed out by plod. Local authorities can enforce off street car parks using anpr if it is an approved device.
