Discussion
I would have thought it more likely to be seagulls, i have seen seagulls swoop down in the past and just grab a baby cynet.
They were killed by a fox.
I think you are the one with the negative attitude, by wanting to ban anything that you personally disagree with. I'm quite happy for plastic to be used appropriately.
I have looked around my home and I am astonished at the ammount of plastic there is but I am not taking such a negative attitude as burneside. There will always be plenty around that takes such negative attitudes, and wait for others to do something about it. I wish I could go on some of those demonstrations, but my health will no longer allow it and who knows, my health might end it all before I ...
Take a good look around your home, you'll find most things have plastic in them somewhere. Feel free to live a 19th century lifestyle if you wish, just don't expect the rest of us to do so too.
If they are made of plastic ------YES!!!! The only bucket I had in my younger days were metal buckets. All plastic items should be banned and the sooner the better.
Buckets are very useful things, should we ban them?
@burnside over 90% over the plastic in the world's oceans originates from just 10 rivers in Africa. How do they know that, where did those that came up with that percentage and know what rivers it came from? It could be true but that does not detract from the fact we have many eminent people (minus David Attenborough) who will tell you that this country produces vast volumnes of plastic ...
St. David of Attenborough has lead a very cushy life courtesy of the taxpayer funded BBC indulging in his hobby, he was in fact a member of the BBC hierachy for a number of years. They do like to look after their own at the BBC By the way, over 90% over the plastic in the world's oceans originates from just 10 rivers, all of which are in Africa and Asia. It isn't Europe that needs to put its ...
Someone has picked up a typo error NATURALIST and not NATURIST, how sad when just the mention of David Attenborough should have told readers it was a typo error. Perhaps I should have mentioned Darwin and many others.