majorp
Lisa, I keep asking you questions to see if you can answer them. I know the answers but it appears you and your peers do not and that is why you do not answer because you can't. All I get back is rubbish in the belief that you are right and I am wrong. And because of that your beliefs are what they are in that ANPR can be used to enforce off street LA owned P&D car parks, when they can't do that ...
How can a camera in a private car park detect anything other than you over-stayed the permitted time. It timed you in and timed you out, if the mathmatical difference takes you over the allowed time, expect a ticket. How would a camera know that you had violated 81 or lets say 85, 87 or 94, 95, 96 or how about 70. The only thing the camera can detect is a vehicle passing the camera one way ...
lisa, everybody including you think that what plod is saying is creditable but it isn't. There is no charge to park on the zig-zags outside of schools but it is a contravention if you do and you will therefore (if ANPR/CCTV) is deployed in the area to capture those parked in contravention, will probably receive a pcn in the post. There is no charge to drive in a bus lane or through a bus ...
No it is not your eyes Lynne. It was an example to show that we do import milk. Years on and things have got worse, regarding the loss of dairy farms in the uk, so we import more milk, not a lot but it is more, and I don't think we import milk just to poor down the drain. So I am wondering where does it end up? We all know how lables can be deceiving. packed in the uk but not sure where it ...
lisa problem as with others, they cannot answer a simple question and until they do they will all believe that ANPR can be used in LA P&D car parks when they cannot be used in those situations at all for enforcement purposes. If plod told you the stars are purple then according to your beliefs they are.
Good! But there maybe problems with traffic looking for alterative route. Elmgrove to Gatehouse, through the lanes and come out at the lower end of Port Road maybe.
Lisa is back again, so perhaps lisa could explain where plod has not. HOW CAN YOU ENFORCE OFF STREET CAR PARKS WHICH ARE PAY AND DISPLAY OWNED BY A LA? IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT IS SAID IN THE TMA 2004. HOW DO YOU DO IT? THAT IS THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM -----------------HOW DO YOU DO IT?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/3187928/Milk-imports-surge-as-British-production-drops-to-30-year-low.html
I will also add that there is strong talk to stop using ANPR/CCTV for buslane/gate enforcement. it is to do with it costing LA's to much money and the DVLA are involved, As you are so good regarding ANPR and it's use, perhaps you can explain why ANPR/CCTV is not such a good idea to enforce using those approved devices.
And I have asked you consistently, to explain to me and others how it would be possible to use that certified device for enforcement purposes in OFF STREET P&D car parks, owned by a LA So far all you have demonstrated with others backing you, is that you are right that ANPR CAN BE USED in off street P&D car parks owned by a LA Until you can do that, all that you have placed on this site is a ...
