Speed69
Cheers, I hear you have enjoyed my "rants"...I try to stay away from here where possible, I'm a passionate guy & while i hate injustice, i am a crown employee, my seniors want to cut public expenditure? let's start at the top then... & also ask viaduct why he sees fit to waste our tax dollars...?
LOL, I've been busy!
LOL, AND YOU DIDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A DATABASE? LOOK FOR THE MARK ON YOUR SHOULDER! AMATEURS
PERSPECTIVE? OK, WHAT ABOUT ALL THE PUBLIC MONEY THAT HAS BEEN WASTED ON CONTESTING THE USE OF CCTV... VIADUCT SHOULD HAVE THE ANSWER TO THIS...
Really protecting terrorists? I suppose you want to send them back where they came from? the foothills of Afghan? back with Osama? here's a thought: let them stay here so Mi5/6 can monitor their behaviour?..oh..there you go, thought process just kicked in.
THESE DAYS PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES? - REALLY? All around us we see adverts telling us we can claim for tripping on a broken kerbstone or such...USE YOUR EYES!!!!WATCH WHERE YOU ARE GOING! ADOPTING ALL THE CRAP FROM THE YANKS- NANNY STATE! NANNY STATE! NANNY STATE!...YES, I AM HERE AND I'M SHOUTING1
the lines are there, clear- & we all know what they mean, so don't waste tax money arguing the toss- however, it is ridiculous to have such enforcement outside such premises as most trade is from motorists after peak times. Traders should be pushing this issue.
let's not forget that any challenge is at the tax payers expense. If enforcement is unlawful ok, but don't try to win your argument by technicality- the lines are there: incorrect measurement or poorly maintained? these people need to get a life, if you can see it, don't park there and challenge enforcement action ( you know who you are )
"as far as I could see"... this suggests that you do not actually know the full story. You have also not stated what was said by both parties.
FOR GOD'S SAKE, HE WE GO AGAIN... AND IT'S A HARRY THING....