General Discussion
Peter Harry Still At It
Unbelievable report in the Express & Echo today! Will the self-publicist ever accept that his delusional and utterly selfish campaign is costing us taxpayers a fortune in legal costs?
Then the councils should act lawfully, the Police would not investigate if there was not a case to answer
They investigate because he's made a complaint, then they (or the CPS) decide if there's a case to answer. I hope the serial busybody gets charged with wasting police time - he gets caught time and again breaking the law and it's about time the book is thrown at him.
If you knew anything about it and read the report, they falsified the map, they said he was parked somwhere else and changed the map to fit him up. The ticket -PCN- said Southernhay West he was parked in Southernhay East so they changed the words in the map to read Southernhay which is a road that does not exist. Do you really think they would send officers to Manchester if they thought there was no case to answer, or are the Police idiots? in your view? It is officers of the council not councillors who did this.
Enjoy Your freedom of speech and the right to use it mocking those who are fighting for your right to have it . If nobody stands up to these Petty local councils and the creeping laws and powers they have, it wont be long before you are in chains.
Using my, admittedly, rudimentary skills at arithmetic, I make it over two months for him to comment. However, one of FEL-699's endearing characteristics is his devotion to duty. This runs to scouring old (and very old) posts until the early hours of the morning. He then thinks long and hard, sometimes for several seconds, before resurrecting some of them in order bring his own wisdom and that of the great posters of the past to a new generation of readers. Don
the case is now being sent to the cps so maybe you doubters will feel differently!!!!! todays express and echo
I don't feel any differently - Peter Harry still deliberately parked illegally, no matter which car park it was in! We'll see whether the CPS feels that there is a charge to answer, assuming the fraud investigator does eventually forward his file. I wonder how much this private eye charges per hour and I wonder who foots his bill?
You know he is a private citizen and charges no one also, absorbs any costs himself, he fights for peoples rights as per the law, which is more than can be said of some authorities, he does not roll over and suck up to what authorities try to force upon us when they are in the wrong, not like DM who believes everything they say and do, could be he is one of them thats why he is so anti. If the Fraud office didnt consider there was a case to answer they would not have spent so much time with the report, which will be sent to the CPS.
Here you go DM, get your teeth into Mr Herron for a change. "Local authorities were accused of unlawfully setting up a system designed to confuse drivers and generate huge incomes. If successful it would abolish controlled parking zones – known as CPZs – around the UK. Mr Herron’s crusade to challenge the nation’s parking regulations began over a £60 parking fine issued five years ago. He has spent £100,000 fighting the case, forced to re- mortgage his home in Sunderland and sell his £20,000 Nissan Navara car.
DM. You can now have a go at me when you read the following, regarding the Loading Bay (The Coop) Dawlish. Received today TDC. Anybody who has received a PCN for that location should apply to DCC to be reimbursed. 2008 2009 2010 56 169 32 "I can now confirm that following your initial enquiries relating to this matter and your FOI request to Devon County Council for a copy of the special authorisation for this sign, Devon County Council confirmed yesterday that no authorisation was applied for and has formally instructed us to suspend enforcement at this location until the sign has been amended"
PJD, Watch this space more to come. In 2007 (I have the declation) E Cholton - Deputy Chief Executive DCC retired - when applying for CPZ (contolled parking zone) he declared to the DfT that all lines and signs had been checked and faults had been remedied, were now lawful and enforceable. FALSE. There are thousands of unenforceable areas throughout Devon. I have no problem enforcing parking, but do it lawfully. EC is now chairman of Exeter City FC, and guess what, now DCC sponsor the shirts, whilst its a small amount of money its our money.
Cheers, I hear you have enjoyed my "rants"...I try to stay away from here where possible, I'm a passionate guy & while i hate injustice, i am a crown employee, my seniors want to cut public expenditure? let's start at the top then... & also ask viaduct why he sees fit to waste our tax dollars...?
HE DOES THIS TIME AFTER TIME! HE'S CLEARLY NOT STUPID! HE IS WASTING TAX PAYERS MONEY! YOUR MONEY! WHO GIVES A CRAP ABOUT THE LEGALITY? HE KNOWS HE PARKED ILLEGALLY, LET'S NOT GET ALL AMERICAN AND GET HIM OFF ON TECHNICALITIES FOR GOD'S SAKE! YOU DO REALISE THIS SAME APPROACH IS WHAT GETS RAPISTS AND HIT N RUN DRIVERS OFF? --JESUS.
HEY, WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE! CAN YOU SEE THE LINES? SHOULD THAT NOT BE ENOUGH? SCREW YOUR TECHNICALITIES, YOU DO THIS ON PURPOSE! LEECH
Fellover (back with more rubbish when you see his comment) "WHO GIVES A CRAP ABOUT THE LEGALITY? Still gives us all a laugh.
Viaduct doesn't post here any longer under that name and none of the current posters seem to have his tone. Possibly things are different for Crown employees but most people in UK pay their tax in Pounds Sterling rather than dollars. Has the special relationship developed more than the public realises? lol Don
you are the one that is laughable druguser and before you go crying to mommy, you started the cat calling first this time ok?, so just take it on the chin. I GIVE a crap about the legality, he knows he should'nt be there, this happens all too often with this time waster! He is no-ones hero but his own- a bloody narcissist.
What a laugh, Your previous post said ' you dont give a crap about legality, and where did I call you a name, I suggest you read the post properly before you spout more rubbish, but you do give me a laugh, keep it going its good fun.
The Council are cash cowing every single penny they can from your car. If no one fights these parking taxes then it will grow and extend. Councils in Devon are already paying for a study looking in to London street parking schemes where residents have to pay to park on the street outside their own homes. It started in London at £15 a year, oh thats not bad Its now £1500 a year in some areas. Do you fancy paying £1500 a year to park your car outside your own house ? Well if you sit back and "take it up the proverbial" you soon will be. on street parking was free in Dawlish not so long back, then in went the meters, in went unnecessary yellow lines to make you use them, up went the charges and they are going up again this summer. out come wardens hawking outside once profitable shops where motorists quickly stopped as passing trade harming no one. The shops go bust, the Tourists stop coming. Then the town Dies. The council parking dept are like a parasite that once they get on your backs they never let go until they bleed a town dry. and where does the money go ? on some stupid diversity scheme dreamt up by some left wing nutcase who hates cars.
Where to start with this one? I'm not sure that Dawlish residents have problems parking outside of their own home due to other people's cars being parked there. I'd imagine that the Devon councils that you cite as looking at existing examples of Residents Only schemes, will primarily be those that contain Universities, and that these schemes would be applied to those areas of the towns/cities where there are many multiple-occupancy homes. This is certainly true of the University Town where I used to live, where these Residents Only schemes have been broadly wlecomed, apart from the usual vocal tiny minority. Can you please let us know whereabouts residents get charged £1500 a year? Thanks. Which yellow lines in Dawlish do you believe to be "unnecessary"? Thanks. As for your last sentence, when was Dawlish last run by anything but a CONDEM council? Thanks once again.
don't be silly "Fellover" is NOT my tag is it? tsk...and the comment was taken out of context by your feeble mind... I give a crap about the fact that the lines were THERE!!! Here's an example: You run a red light and you challenge this AT THE TAX PAYERS EXPENSE, because either: the red wasn't actually red but a faded red/orange OR that you are colour blind... YOU KNOW THE ORDER OF THE LIGHTS, don't go looking for technicalities! That's what harry does, so as far as the law is concerned, I DON'T give a crap about legality when the defendant uses TECHNICALITIES... I GIVE a crap about MORALITY...You are the joke here.
You have lost the thread completely, they DCC/ECC altered the map to fit him up, thats not a technicality that is perverting the course of justice, thats why detectives went to Manchester and seized the paperwork and it is now with the fraud squad, if it was not so serious they would have bothered. or are they stupid? With regard to calling me Drug User I have to plead guilty, I tried a joint many years ago when living and working in Ibiza, didnt like it and never tried it or anthing else again
you need to be careful making accusations until the investigation is concluded.. personally and in a "real world" frame of mind, I would ask Mr harry: WAS YOUR VEHICLE PARKED IN AN AREA (FORGET THE ROAD NAME, THAT'S A TECHNICALITY)WHERE ROAD MARKINGS SUGGESTED NO PARKING? HIS ( OR MAYBE YOUR) ANSWER WOULD HAVE TO BE YES... HE WAS MORALLY IN THE WRONG, HE'S NO-ONES HERO, TAX LEECH, TIME WASTER, NARCISSIST AND A THORN IN MY SIDE, I DESPISE HIM. DO YOU HAVE A NOSE, BECAUSE IT SHOULD BE AS CLEAR AS THAT PROBOSCIS ON YOUR VISAGE.
FEL699, You say, "I DON'T give a crap about legality when the defendant uses TECHNICALITIES." Is this not another way of saying that you have regard for the law only when you agree with it? Any criminal or anarchist might say the same. The technicalities are, in fact, part of the law. However I agree with you about morality. I have my own code of ethics that I use to guide my actions. However, morality is essentially personal and may often be in conflict with the law. There is no agreement that ethics can be regarded as absolute, definitive and unvarying, although some people believe it. Ethical relativism holds the "morally correct" decision can vary according to the situaton. For example, most people might regard it as morally wrong to kill another person and this is reinforced by law in states across the world. However those same states will insist that it is morally right to kill in times of war and many impose the death penalty for some crimes in times of peace. Another similar example would be over the question of whether it is right to kill one person if it saves the lives of two people. Having said all that, I cannot see how running a red light or parking on yellow lines are moral, as distinct from legal, issues. Don
you are quite an arrogant person aren't you? you also believe in anarchy? would anarchy give you your idiot box tv, your choice of food in the supermarket, your choice of vehicle to drive, a roof over your head? grow up.
FEL-699, I cannot see that your post is a response to mine. I am interested in your opinions and why you hold them but have no interest in exchanges where we sneer at or abuse one another. Don
Once again you missed the point "you need to be careful making accusations" The Police Detectives ( who I met ) investigated first, they then went to Manchester to seize the files, it was then decided by the Police that it was too serious for them to handle and passed it to the Fraud Squad who, when their report is completed will pass it to the CPS for consideration as whether to prosecute or not. I think you get carried away with your hatred of PH, if the CPS decide to prosecute that will ruin you day even more, if they decide not to prosecute you will be able to get your toys out and have a happy little play.
? maybe I was a little abrupt last night...I apologise... there have been a few shakeups @ westminster lately...I am NOT one of the crooked Civ's...I am a tax payer as well, but in the area that I work, I am passionate about justice- which Gov has not been for a long time...(time to get topical) Crossbow Cannibal? I'm fighting my emotions right now- oo! mature student?, criminology? murderer of prostitutes?- it's easy to say ( and some will!) we are better off with out the hookers... HOWEVER, these girls were, ARE someone's children... the PIMPS are the scum. The families are still in sufferance... for such crimes, 18th century justice could be considered? If he will not allow the greiving families closure- FORCE IT OUT OF HIM! a total arse, did he expect to be sectioned for his comment & receive a lesser (cosier) sentence? If he thinks he is so clever, let him share my experience. Rapists, Murderers & Terrorists who go "silent"- WATERBOARD! LEGALISE IT NOW! I had to suffer it just for my job & it didn't kill me (but it was bloody abominable)... The U.S gets more aggressive in it's tactics, while WE become more politically correct as a result of their actions? (pause)... you know what? I'm not going to mention Mr Harry until (maybe) he does something again that gets my back up... If you got to this point Don, sorry, but please don't mock me or I will leave the forum for good & then who will people talk about? I think most people here no each other, but they don't know me. Impossible. You actually remind me of Penny Rimbaud (facially)
LOOK! STOP BEING AN IDIOT! USE YOUR EYES, IF YOU SEE LINES THEN YOU ARE TAKING YOUR CHANCES, DON'T GRIPE ABOUT THE MEASUREMENTS! AND DON'T GRIPE WHEN YOU GET CAUGHT... I'VE EXCEEDED 98MPH in an area I KNOW I SHOULD'NT.. THAT'S THE CHANCE I TOOK FOR THE SITUATION & IT WORKED OUT OK, SOMEONE LIVED TO SEE ANOTHER DAY WITH THEIR FAMILY, BUT IF I HAD BEEN CAUGHT WHILE NOT ON... well it would have been awkward, but it's for the greater good- If I had killed anyone during the process "I" would have accepted the consequences, but that was not an option at the time... YOU REALISE THAT THE MAJORITY OF "RAPE" CASES ARE DROPPED ( MEANING THE GUYS GET AWAY WITH IT) BECAUSE OF "TECHNICALITIES"? YOU SEE A SKINHEAD WITH A SWASTIKA ON HIS FACE, A BROKEN BOTTLE IN HIS HAND AND HE'S POINTING TOWARDS YOU? YOU KNOW YOU ARE IN TROUBLE, WHY ARE YOU GOING TO CONTEST IT? JESUS, IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
LOL, I now know who you are! cheers, saved me a few hours! I had my clues, but after seeing you face to face (recently, think hard) it's clear you are in league with Mr Harry, so your comments have no relevance to me
FEL-699, Thanks for the post. I hope that I do not come over as mocking. Neither am I trying to convert people to my opinions - if there is any intention common to my posts, it is to try to stimulate readers to question their ideas and beliefs and to continue to think about them rather than set them in stone. I know one person who used to post here but, with the names people use, it is difficult to tell. I always use my own name here and elsewhere and, even if I fail sometimes, I try to not to say anything in my posts that I would not say if I was face to face with the person concerned. I had never heard of Penny Rimbaud but will now read the wiki article. Don
I agree with you FEL-699. PIMPS are the ones causing problems, as for these poor girls who knows what goes on in their lives. As one mother of one of the girls said " she took the wrong road in life"
Thats great you know who I am, so lets meet and see who you are. I did think hard but insignificant people dont register.
These women are the victims of the asian drug trade in heroine, they sell their bodies to pay for drugs. Sort the growing and import of heroine and the problem will diminish
Love the post about skinhead , swastika and broken bottle. Just one problem , you cant always believe/take things at 1st site. Lately the newspapers have shown a picture of a skinhead, with a swastika on his arm giving the nazi salute. He was pictured on an EDL march. This was used by the press to indicate that the EDL are racist. The skinhead was later arrested and found to be a member of Unite against Facism, who are supported by David Cameron.The skinhead was a left wing student at Lancaster Uni. Back to Harry the parking dodger, instead of wasting taxpayers money, try finding somewhere safe to park. I remember those vehicles parked on double yellows near the station .It was a death waiting to happen, as we all know that a number of people got hit. Harry you have blood on your hands.
I find the following comment a bit silly " Harry you have blood on your hands. and what double yellow do you mean?
When a law is passed it must have guide lines made by the enforcing body. This lets people know what the law is about and how to stay with in it. If it states that you must not park in certain areas or pay to park in certain areas, it must give guide lines on how to do so. Hence size of lines, possitioning of lines etc. So if those that make the law cannot stick to the law they make, it will always be open for people like Harry to point this out. In other areas the lines and positioning of them have been changed, to with in what is required thus stopping people like Harry questioning any alledged infringements. Well here in Devon they dont seemed to have done that, so that gives Harry opertunity to seek the holes in the law that has been made. Simple its not difficult, you make a law, stick to the rules that you made and people will not try to find holes in them, and when you do accuse some one of breaking that law , make sure you get the street right. Its not difficult is it.
Lazlo did you read my post on the 20th if not here it is again, this from Devon CC, which relates to the Coop Loading Bay "I can now confirm that following your initial enquiries relating to this matter and your FOI request to Devon County Council for a copy of the special authorisation for this sign, Devon County Council confirmed yesterday that no authorisation was applied for and has formally instructed us to suspend enforcement at this location until the sign has been amended" They have now confirmed they will not reimburse persons unlawfully fined. Using the FOI I can now confirm they did not have a Traffic Order - TRO - for 2008, yet were fining people, that of course is Fraud. AS I have said many times, I have nothing against parking enforcment, but make it legal.
In the absence of a reply from Mark, I did some research yesterday. The going rate for residents' parking in London boroughs seems to be up to about £150 p.a. or a little more. In some boroughs this entitles you to park only near your home, in others across the borough. I shall not comment as to whether this is reasonable as I know that each of you will have your own views. Don
Sorry DM, You have the answers in the Post you have just commented on, unless I missed something in your Post.