Daverc
Thanks Huw, interesting.
Well, 1263, I don't agree, but, even if I did, then it would be (1) illegal; (2) impossible or ineffective.
Sorry carer, must have missed it somehow.
BBC Spotlight says this year's early brood had seven cygnets, now reduced to five by gulls.
Yes indeed, couldn't agree more.
Bad luck Carer. I get prescriptions regularly from Barton and never have to wait more than two days.
Thank you Lynne, what would this forum be without you ?
I'm sure everyone is fed up with this, so I'll say one thing more and then shut up. Promise. Note the 'not causing obstructions' phrase in Lynne's post. Cassandra's original post seemed to imply that householders must be able to park outside their property even if by doing so they cause an obstruction. If that was not what you meant then I apologise.
@Cassandra : the last sentence. AFAIK, householders have no rights to any part of the Queen's Highway (whether it is outside their property or not) except the common right of free passage. I remember Cllr John Clatworthy saying 'parking on the highway is a privilege not a right'.
Can't agree Cassandra. What you say sounds like common sense but I believe it isn't so. Happy to be corrected if anyone knows better.
