General Discussion
I am quite sure you would prefer the pavilion fiasco to be quietly forgotten, I doubt the fallout from it will enhance your chances of electoral success next year.
You are quite right, Crow did live in a council house (but certainly not the one he was born and raised in), despite receiving a salary in excess of £140,000. I'm damn sure social housing wasn't intended for people on that kind of money.
@Mrs C As I said to another poster at the weekend, you have no knowledge of my present domestic arrangements.
@Likeablerat Vickery is a politician and therefore subject to scrutiny, he has also been the lead Councillor driving forward the ill-fated wood louse proposal, which despite what he thinks, will not now go forward. In my opinion he deserves all the flak which comes his way for trying to impose his folly on the town.
That's it then, the money for the wood louse is not forthcoming and never will be, and despite what Vickery's imagination tells him, the majority of consultation respondents did NOT want it blighting the lawn. Yet again his pipe dream has gone up in smoke. It's just as well that Vickery has publicly stated he is unlikely to stand for re-election next year because after this fiasco it is highly ...
@Lindapetherick You have no knowledge of my present domestic arrangements and therefore are totally unqualified to make the comment you posted earlier. I suggest you pause and think before opening your mouth in the future.
Vickery, you have wasted £23,000!
And plenty of people don't like the plans, 56% to be precise.
I'm not a lawyer Mrs C, hence I won't risk repeating potential libel in public.
@Mrs C I have no intention of repeating your remarks on this thread, could be potential libel.