General Discussion
What is misleading about saying I work for an employer? I do! What is misleading about saying those who work for employers do not necessarily have the flexibility or luxury to attend these consultations during the day? They don't! Clearly Mrs C you completely misunderstood my post!
Mrs C, do you ever post anything remotely interesting or useful?
For those of you who didn't mange to get to the Strand Hall over the last three days, because let's face it, like me you work for an employer and do not have the flexibility or luxury to attend during the day, then please do complete your survey on- line at surveymonkey .com. Your views are important and will decide what happens next.
Fine, then display both the architect plans and the plans submitted to Teignbridge council, in fact, I am assuming that is what will happen as to do anything different would be absurd. I too am off to bed!
I absolutely agree, there is a serious consultation underway and that has happened because some Councillors forced the issue and insisted upon a timely consultation and on proper procedures for the collection and analysis of the completed surveys.
Oh dear Judith, too much liaison with Councillor Clayson who refers to his electorate rather grandly as his constituents! As local Councillors we have electors, only Members of Parliament have constituents. But... No I don't misunderstand or misinterpret I just don't use smoke and mirrors to try and confuse people. If the drawings are the same then why not display both? Unless, of course, ...
Dear me! Robert Vickery's post at 21.50 sounds like a done deal even before the people of Dawlish have been consulted! Quote "We have worked with the architects to develop a scheme which can start on site after Carnival and Air Show 2015 and be complete by June 2016, to comply with CCF requirements and fit our quieter visitor seasons". Deeply worrying for the people of Dawlish!
If that is the case then there is NO reason whatsoever to NOT have both sets of plans at the consultation venues. Let us have both the architect plans AND the planning application plans displayed side by side.
@Bob Vickery, I am not assured if the only plans on display at the consultation venues are the architect plans. Both sets of plans need to be on display to enable people to make an informed decision.
The point I am a making is that both the architect plans AND the plans submitted to Teignbridge planning committee should be, and I hope are, on display side by side for the consultation process so everyone can view the proposals in the round.
