Very rarely do I recommend anything or anybody. But this time I feel the need to say what a wonderful service I received recently from Steve and his team. I had the most comprehensive eye test I have ever had, nothing was too much trouble and the result was a pair of glasses that I can actually use, unlike the last two pairs, shouldn't have gone to Spec Savers.
I expect the undertakers arrived after I left the scene. That would explain why the other emergency services left the scene, they wouldn't have a body bag. But as Devon live has reported, there will be an update.
A lot of activity in the toilets which were taped off by the police. Police, paramedics and quick response were all in attendance. Police still in attendance after paramedics and the other emergency team had left. I saw now one being carried out, but that is not to say they won't be. The papers will grab the news no doubt.
The EU will lose its third largest financial contributor, the 2016 figures show our contributions amounted to 13.45% of the EU budget,. That's quite a large hole to fill once we've gone.
@leatash Not a lot if anything. The only thing I can think of is they will not be able to tell us what to do or how to do it. Other than that. Business as usual
The question is what have the EU to lose after brexit.
The Irish PM has announced in the event of a "hard" Brexit then UK aircraft could be banned from flying across EU territories. The right to fly over another country's land is not governed by the EU at all, but by the global International Air Services Transit Agreement. His assertion is made even more ridiculous with the revelation that the RAF actually polices Ireland's airspace because it does ...
Since when did our elected goverment of any colour make the general public privy to there decisions going to war etc we elect our representative to represent us thats democracy. But could it be that the outlook of a hard brexit is so bad that goverment finds it impossible to tell us as it may cause mass hysteria riots and looting or is it there is nothing to tell.
The terms hard and soft Brexit had never been used until Leave won the referendum. Soft Brexit is a ruse invented by Remainers to try to keep us in the EU by the back door, and it was fully endorsed by May with the publication of her Chequers plan. It's the game she has been playing for the last two years, but thankfully her wings have now been clipped by true Brexiteers in the government.
Leatash: I agree it has never happened before. That is why the government is (now) making contingency plans in case it all goes **** up and it is making those contingency plans at the behest of those hardline Brexiteers in parliament who want a hard Brexit. As Burneside has correctly pointed out it is a government's responsibility to make contingency plans and act upon them. And as I have ...