General Discussion
@Lynne I don't expect you to be impressed by the SDA candidate, you've been charmed by Wrigley. Charm is a useful tool, but it is superficial and acquired. I won't be intimidated when I'm simply trying to raise awareness and highlight an alternative candidate and political group taking on the failed, dysfunctional norm; Wrigley represents the worst aspects of modern politics. He is not part of ...
Jeez! What a rant. Yes I am fully aware of the Lib Dems part in the Coalition government and I don't think threy will be doing anything like that again.They got a bloody nose in the 2015 GE as a result. I' was beginning to think that for some reason you thought I was answerable to you . So glad that you realize that I. am. not.! BTW - not in the least bit impressed by the SDA ...
@Lynne Jesus. this really is wearing thin and getting tiresome. You haven't answered my question. I already know that you state you're voting for Wrigley because you want rid of Morris. If you don't want to tell us other reasons for voting for Wrigley and the Lib Dems, then just say so. You're not obliged to. However if participating in a discussion forum where you're attempting to influence ...
@lynne yes you can vote for the lib dems, shame that you didnt say upfront you are a lib dem supporter...me i am not biased as i detest all of the main party politicans and have no political affiliations, but what strikes me is that rotten borough have said that wreigly contacted webmaster about sda comments , i dont know if that is true but if it is why, as he not answered or refuted the ...
I've given you my answer . I vote tactically because of the voting syyem that we have. Different people have different reasons for voting the way that they do. My prority is how I can best express my anti-Tory vote. And from my point of view that isn't by voting for the SDA candidate (or any other for that matter).
@Lynne I asked you to tell us why we should vote for Lib Dem Wrigley other than the fact he's not Tory Anne-Marie Morris, i.e. other than tactical voting reasons whether you think that's valid or not. I still await your answer.
My valid reason for tactically voting Lib Dem is that I think he stands more chance of beating AMM than the Labour candidate. Voting tactically is not nonsense. It makes non-sense not to do so. And I would vote Green or Labour tactically ( as appropriate) in any other constituency for the same reason.
@Lynne I will be voting SDA, because government at any level cannot function in the interests of the people on corrupt foundations. It is that simple. And yes I advocate that others vote for the SDA, but I also offer valid reasons for doing so. I haven't told anyone to vote for the SDA. I haven't just issued an instruction without offering a sound argument for doing so, unlike your post. ...
So if you aren't advocating that people should vote SDA then why do you keep going on and on and on about them and posting their candidate's election address.? If you didn't want people to vote SDA then you wouldn't be doing that, would you? PS I see that the SDA candidate openly admits that "Labour isn't putting up a fight here".
@Lynne I have made people aware that the SDA exists. I haven't told anyone who to vote for, unlike you in this thread. Why should anyone listen to you after 5 years of Lib Dem local government which puts them firmly in the toxic category along with Morris and the Tories. You can't even acknowledge the Lib Dem's awful record in local government or the fact the South Devon Alliabce has been the ...