General Discussion
True, it is the Tory members who will select its leader (and therefore our Prime Minister) but they are not representative of the wider electorate who, at some time or the other, will have their say on the matter.
Not from where I'm standing Burneside. And there are Tories who agree with me. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/politics/news/104672/grassroots-tories-would-sacrifice-union-if-it-meant-brexit-being and I think Boris might be a bit difficult to 'sell' in Scotland come the next GE ...
The only people supporting creepy Stewart were the Lib Dems and other Remainers, they are bereft on social media tonight that their poster boy has been defeated.
Being rather presumptious there aren't you, Lynne?
Glad Rory is out, fed up with listening to his non-sense.
@Burneside rUk = remaining UK after Scotland has become independent and NI becomes part of the RoI. @Paul The EU doesn't do nowt. Amongst other things it negotiates trade deals on behalf of its member countries.
Unless you are a card carrying Tory theres no point in discussing /watching because it's them that will elect the leader.
A UK/US deal will be beneficial to both our countries. Both have a lot to offer. Post Brexit we won't have the eu taking they huge cut for doing nout.
What's this "rUk" you keep talking about?
So if American interests are first in any trade deal (understandably from the US's point of view) then it follows that other countries' interests are of secondary importance. The US, having the largest economy, has more clout than the (r)UK. So who will come off best then?