A few examples: Dog owners would allow their dogs to shit all over the beach. Idiots would feed chips to seagulls. Unknowings would feed white bread to ducks, be it near to nesting swans or not. Morons would park on double yellow lines or claim that they didn’t realise they had to pay and display. People with children wouldn’t find the mini playpark at the Manor.
I’m sorry. You asked for any information and I provided some.
Majorp. Where’s the evidence of corruption in the planning examples you gave?
Here’s some information: Lane Configuration : Lane 1 is gained from the entry sliproad. Lane 2 continues ahead. Lane 3 continues ahead. Lane 1 exits and does not return. Lane 2 continues ahead. Lane 3 continues ahead. Then further along: Lane 1 splits to create a new lane. Lane 2 continues ahead.
I’ve just read today’s Gazette. I find it intriguing that Ms Foden (strange how articles almost always fail to mention that she’s a pseudo-independent town councillor) states in one breath that the original consultation failed to represent the views of enough Dawlish residents, yet her petition was apparently signed by only a few more (7-ish% of the Dawlish population??). It’s a pity that ...
Why are you so negative about everything though Burneside? It’s not healthy and no fun for you or those around you - you should know as well as anyone that life’s too short to be moaning about everything.
Watching Dave Plus One or whatever random channel at that time of night? Your subscription to Babestation must have expired... Why do some people thrive in negativity? It’s such a shame.
Wait a minute. You’re the one that just wrote “most residents”! Why ask me to disprove your assertion? I agree that most elderly residents might not want a playpark, but most residents??? Really?
“Most residents”? Not true.
At least you didn’t waste any money on unnecessary explanation marks... I’m surprised though that Purrrrrfect doesn’t know what a termite looks like. I mean, he must have taken a photo or a dashcam video of one before...