This site uses cookies

Dawlish Against Censorship

Dawlish Against Censorship's Posts

@1263 On insurance, it has been referred to as an 'uninsurable event'. Some might call it  'an act of God'. Both of which seems a load of BS as the pub was just neglected over a long period of time and the issue was well known. Or is neglect now classed as 'an act of God'?

4 days ago

Was there really ‘overwhelming’ agreement to support further exploration into buying the 17th century pub with the aim of running it as a community pub? Or is that just what the MDA and Wrigley want us to believe? The Dolphin in Kenton isn't comparable as half of it hasn't crumbled to bits.

@burnside are you naming and shaming them then? Or is someone else?

@burnside The Town Council, so the likes of Linus Dawson and the rest of the Lib Dem mafia.

This video is really just to ridicule and humilaite 'people living with obesity' who are taking exercise.

@1263 I didn't need to.

2 weeks ago

@1263 You really need to look up a definition of body shaming before you make such claims. Exactly how I have attacked/derided anyone based on 'physical attributes'? And how have I 'body shamed' anyone?

2 weeks ago

@1263 Yes of course I have heard of 'body shaming'. Care to explain the relevance? @burneside Careful now, you'll be accused of attacking and deriding a person's physicality and going 'beyond the pale'.

2 weeks ago

@1263 Have you ever seen the person I refer to above, either in person or in a photo? If so, and instead of childishly calling me thick once again, please explain exactly how I have attacked/derided anyone based on 'physical attributes'?

2 weeks ago

@1263 Why the over-reaction? No, I wouldn't refer to anyone using sticks to walk as a 'cripple' as that is pejorative and insulting, as well as offensive. I would refer to them as 'disabled', as that would be factually correct. So again. Please explain exactly how I have attacked/derided anyone based on 'physical attributes'?