“So how many times have you now been banned Mrs C? And yet here you are again.” You tell us. And then shoot me.
So you don't have a sensible answer then, Remoaners never do.
“What would be the outcome of MPs voting to reject the terms of our exit” They would be shot at dawn. As traitors should be...
So how many times have you now been banned Mrs C? And yet here you are again.
What would be the outcome of MPs voting to reject the terms of our exit, or even no deal at all. Do they think we will just stay in the EU as if the referendum had never taken place?
Bless you Burneside. Brotherly love is so sweet. Now there are less of you mindlessly reporting....
I thought it was impossible to get banned from this forum, Mrs C, if it was you wouldn't be able come back endlessly with yet another username each time.
PS. Back to the thread subject, Wrigley has absolutely no chance. Like he didn’t have in North Devon at the last election before he threw in the towel there before polling had even started. I think a lot of people will see him as the professional politician wannabe that he is. “For himself, not the many”.
A lie. Just like the many lies that you Leavers and your media peddled two years ago. Few objectors want to overturn the 2016 vote. Many believe that MPs should have a vote on the final terms of the exit. Thank god that the Internet didn’t exist 1914-18, as no doubt the likes of Burneside would have trolled WWI conscientious objectors and called them “traitors”. Whilst at the same time ...
Remain MPs and their supporters are attempting to overturn one of the largest votes this country has seen in modern times, "traitors" is entirely appropriate, may be even a tad too polite.