Lynne
To return to objectivity and bias and university funding. If neo-liberalism funds our universities thus putting a big question mark over research objectivity, then surely howesoever our universities (or universities anywhere for that matter) were to be funded wouldn't there still be question marks about objectivity. Indeed, is there any such thing as objectivity? Have you read "The ...
So, if you believe there is no system or sub-system of neoliberalism that could be truly independent and without bias, can you suggest an alternative system? (and yes I did read the article).
I'm not talking about the current system. I'm asking if you have in mind a university funding system that would not lead itself open to claims that it might bias academic research.
Well, to go off the subject of the EU a tad - do have any funding source in mind that you consider would enable universities to be unbiased and objective?
To return to the EU debate. Wonder if these academics could give us an objective pro and con analysis? https://www.exeter.ac.uk/news/featurednews/title_490335_en.html
@Paul - or we could spend the money on something much more worthwhile and which many more people would benefit from.
Trains - note this from the above website. The length of time it takes to walk from Powderham to Starcross (20mins and I guess that's on a good day when there are no crowds), the approx time that the last set will finish (22.00hrs) and the times of the last trains leaving Starcross going in a westerly direction. Sat. 22.36 Sun 22.29
And if they returned to the UK adding to the housing, NHS and social care crises?
oooooo.........er............ do so hope the weather isn't like this next weekend!
Geldof to lead the 'In' campaign then! (but not on Mondays 'cos he doesn't like 'em )
