Mcjrpc
I share Beelzebub's sentiments but if Councillors are to disparage others I would like them to be specific rather than hint, otherwise it casts doubt over the identity of their intended victim. Margaret, perhaps you missed my question, so I'd like to ask it again: On the other post you said "Many people were told that the proposed new building was only twice the size of the current ...
Lack of response doesn't mean lack of interest Warrior but political ideology is way too complex to debate by keyboard. Ultimately hasn't the ideological gap narrowed and doesn't the adage of 'whoever you vote for, the government always gets in' apply now more than ever ? I would like to know how many/how often voters change their voting allegiance in their lifetime. Do they remain ...
Webmaster - forget the rules, it's your game, take the ball in!
Oh just give it a rest will you Elvis. You didn't have to post anything at all but you just couldn't let it go could you. Not sure why you take the moral highground, you're no better.
Were you referring to Boris or have you crossed over to the dark side Roberta?
To be fair to Elvis Mrs C, he did make that offensive comment before he knew the woman had died. I think it'd be better if most people bowed out (and I include myself), took a break, wiped the slate clean and if necessary, came back with new usernames and a different approach. At least the baggage would be left behind albeit ready for a new set to be built up.
@ALLEMS - Why is it irrelevant? If someone has been pulling the wool over our eyes I for one would like to know. Alternatively I could go off topic or call someone an idiot, but I thought I'd break with tradition by finding out more.
Margaret on the other post you said "Many people were told that the proposed new building was only twice the size of the current bandstand". I'd like to know more about this. Who was told and by whom? When? Why? Were they referring to the volume or the footprint? Did it affect anything? Please can you elaborate. Thank you.
283 people have actively voted in favour, not a handful. As I said earlier, even with a mobilised 'no' contingency, the stated views are still pretty much split down the middle. No-one can claim to be representing the majority of the people of Dawlish because the real 'majority' haven't expressed a view.
You're out of order Chris, you're also meant to insult someone.
