Speed69
LOL :-)
christ almighty , get a life... did not want to come back here , but felt the need in case someone was spouting garbage about me... seems i was right. I know what is morally right and wrong and i am getting thoroughly sick and tired of the tirade of abuse from viaduct and user4549, so much so, that i was contemplating posting such anger at their ignorance, i was looking forward to being removed ...
are you drunk? I have explained that already. keep taking the pills dear. maybe you are Mr Harry after all, the reasons why all his cases are dropped is that the magistrates were mentally worn down by an incessant tirade of moronic cacophony. you'll be telling me you fought in the wars for the likes of me next.
How many more times? the the dvla were pursuing an alleged offence for a motor vehicle unlicensed on the public highway. If a sorn was in force, the charge would have been greater, having an unlicensed on the public highway whilst a sorn was in force. he got off (ie- he did not win) on a technicality, as records could not show the status of where the vehicle was kept. Dvla did not fail in this ...
a "slight" flaw in the (commendable) story there: "Roy's solicitor has stated that Roy will not resist extradition and will plead guilty, despite having done nothing wrong. "Roy believes that being innocent of the crimes you are charged with does not constitute a valid defence. He would not want to rely on that sort of technicality." A certain someone was never found guilty, but we all know, ...
another thing before i go and do something less sad with my life... your comments on not helping me if i were an invalid female fallen out of my carriage, just demonstrates to all the readers out there, just how psycopathic you really are! I really cannot wait to see what Mr Harry has planned next.
4549 and viaduct really are senile old farts or naive young kids! You will find that it is YOU who is actually wrong. bloody hell how stupid can 2 people be? 1) what about the caravans? are they owned by residents in that area or who own the parking area? there is no legal issue then ---CARAVANS DO NOT REQUIRE A ROAD FUND LICENCE!!! 2) When Mr Harry was reported for the transit van, the law ...
REALLY? REALLY? I heard someone tried to make a deal with the DVLA ...they said no.
yes i AM better qualified! on the date Mr harry was reported, legislation did not require keepers of motor vehicles to declare SORN if kept OFF PUBLIC road! trouble is, the parking bay did not fall under the act at that time... STILL NOT GOT THE POINT? WHY SHOULD HE BE ALLOWED TO DUMP A SHED OF A VEHICLE IN FRONT OF SOMEONE ELSE'S HOUSE? NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY ON THIS MATTER, YOU ARE WRONG. DO ...
ha ha ha , you have no idea the depths of my intellect old man.