Mcjrpc
Indeed, this is a bigger story than one man resisting a CPO of his farm, it needs to get to the bottom of why TDC is ignoring the two most obvious and adjacent sites. The owners of those sites will be quids in if they can sidestep an agricultural price for SANGS in favour of a more lucrative housing development price. Why is TDC supporting them? Do these landowners (who clearly have other ...
I stopped at the stall today and want to double check something. Is it right that the owners of the land earmarked for the housing development also own Options 1 and 2 earmarked for SANGS, which happen to be adjacent to the proposed housing, as opposed to Option 3 (Weekes Farm) some distance away? Is it also true that the landowner prefers to hold on to Options 1&2 for further housing ...
And here are the directors. http://companycheck.co.uk/company/07761331/WELLNESS-2020-LIMITED/directors-secretaries#people-summary Bizarre. Why would the police issue such a vague warning when you only have to google the phone number to trace them.
Is this notion of deterring visitor numbers to Dawlish Warren for real? How can something like that become an objective in an area which is founded on holiday parks and tourism? If it really is a primary goal surely the obvious thing would be to compulsorily purchase a couple of caravan parks. That'd put paid to the visitor numbers (and knock out a sizeable chunk of the local economy ...
Lynne - I hope you're putting yourself forward for the Steering Group.
Margaret, why bother agreeing with my thread then continue with your bickering? Why don't you take it to the Lawn and pull each other's hair out like two hormonal teenagers. I'm sure you'll pull a bigger crowd and at least they can choose to avoid it, we're forced to read this nonsense. WEBMASTER - would you consider moderating posts before they are published? I'm guessing, like me, ...
Please will you both GIVE IT A REST. It's gone on for too long and you are now hijacking nearly every thread with your incessant petty slanging match. You don't have to keep hammering home each other's shortcomings, we're well able to make our own judgements. Why not switch your insults to private messages and let others get a word in edgeways.
Truly dispiriting but not suprising, these people have been a liability for a long time. I can't help thinking this is a topic that most regular posters wanting the best for Dawlish would agree on. So instead of all the unpleasant backbiting that hijacks this forum why not try to turn a page and find some common ground. Or not.
Yeah right. What's the likelihood those planners went to the meetings by public transport.
Reading the document the farmer said from the outset that he's unwilling to sell. Imagine having the prospect of a compulsory purchase order hanging over you while all this is figured out, you couldn't make any long term plans or investment. Meanwhile a landowner in Cockwood wants to sell his 400 acres. Sod's law. That aside, I'm not sure that land will provide adequate parking for the ...
