Discussion
Still waiting.. and still no changes on the website. Just silence.
@webmaster see my last post at 21:30 and your last post at 21:27. Hypothetically how would a post by someone else appear at let's say 21:28 that hadn't been there before 21:30? how is that possible?
Well, like others, I am astonished by the personal remarks made by the Webmaster, that is NOT their role. But, I have always had my suspicions about said Webmaster and his/her supposedly impartiality!!
@webmaster you told @TheObserver 'i think you are wrong to denigrate gary for posting on here' at 15:52. Seemed like an objection to me. Objection: a reason for disagreeing with or opposing something : a reason for objecting
@webmaster , you can't object to people on dawlish.com having a low opinion of politicians, whether those politicians had an account on dawlish.com or not. Theresa May obviously doesn't give a damn about people struggling to make ends meet. I'll treat her with the contempt she treats others. Le Pen is a racist therefore if we are to treat her as she treats others then we'd do so in a ...
@Indy Scot , you just agreed it is best to treat people in the same way you would want to be treated yourself on here. I don't see why someone closing their account should change this.
Well, good for you, Brooklyn Bridge, but I have witnessed a dog owner who didn't pick up his dog's poo. There was an old man in the Manor in the middle of the afternoon and his dog left a great steaming pile right by the side of the footpath, just handy for one of the kids to step in. I spoke to him about it and said that he could be fined and he just looked at me blankly as if I was talking a ...
@webmaster - Past tense you mean - Gary Taylor closed his account before the comments made by @TheObserver , therefore he was no longer a member. So @TheObserver 's comments were about a former member, a politician like any other. unless you're telling us that @Gary Taylor is still a member and he hasn't closed his account.
@Indy Scot , Gary Taylor is a dawlish.com member and the others aren’t. That is the difference.
@webmaster i wasn't suggesting any high ranking politician is likely to post on this site. you've misunderstood me. but yes i agree in that unlikely scenario traffic would be huge. I meant if you intervene to object to people having a strong view against someone like Cllr Gary Talyor, then why not intervene against strong views and denigration of other politicians and where does it end the ...