The approved device certificate for PADM058 (posted above by Plod) dated 2017 clearly makes nonsense of relying on a letter dated 2015.
Lisa, I keep asking you questions to see if you can answer them. I know the answers but it appears you and your peers do not and that is why you do not answer because you can't. All I get back is rubbish in the belief that you are right and I am wrong. And because of that your beliefs are what they are in that ANPR can be used to enforce off street LA owned P&D car parks, when they can't do that ...
ANPR cameras are linked to a central control unit that is monitored by people. If a car is seen parked in an area of a car park where it should not be for example, then a PCN can be served by post based on evidence gained through the ANPR approved device. Its works the same way as ANPR used for bus lane and box junction enforcement. Those ANPR cameras are monitored by people and those people ...
How can a camera in a private car park detect anything other than you over-stayed the permitted time. It timed you in and timed you out, if the mathmatical difference takes you over the allowed time, expect a ticket. How would a camera know that you had violated 81 or lets say 85, 87 or 94, 95, 96 or how about 70. The only thing the camera can detect is a vehicle passing the camera one way ...
You just keep asking questions majorp. No supporting evidence, no rationale, just bluster and questions. It's about time you started providing the answers to your questions if you want us to to find you credible. I don't think you know the answers which is why you keep asking Plod and now me and is why you have also asked Bournemouth Council to provide the answers with your FOI request. ...
If private parking companies are able to use ANPR to detect parking contraventions then it is equally possible for a council who uses ANPR to do the same. Most of the parking contravention descriptions below can be detected using an approved ANPR device. Especially so if the pay & display machines require reg numbers to be inputted and are linked to the same computer system as the ANPR device(s). ...
lisa, everybody including you think that what plod is saying is creditable but it isn't. There is no charge to park on the zig-zags outside of schools but it is a contravention if you do and you will therefore (if ANPR/CCTV) is deployed in the area to capture those parked in contravention, will probably receive a pcn in the post. There is no charge to drive in a bus lane or through a bus ...
So if that isn't okay for you, do you know what? I am not in the least bit bothered. (Must go now have The Mail to read. You know the one I feel sure. It's that Tory supporting newspaper whose editor I understand owns quite a few acres up in Scotland..........)
What you believe to be true might be enough evidence for you, it isn't for me, you'll have to do better than that.
What I perceive is reality enough for me. If you haven't seen/don't see those posters then all I can suggest is that you take yourself off to your nearest optician.