@Mrs C Clearly, whoever arranged the banners in Dawlish didn't have a clue.
You have to strain upwards to read the banners which are ridiculously small, just visit any other town to see how it should have been done. And my eyesight is fine rat.
I doubt people even notice them, they are placed too high and are too small, waste of time and money.
I am quite sure you would prefer the pavilion fiasco to be quietly forgotten, I doubt the fallout from it will enhance your chances of electoral success next year.
@Likeablerat As I have already pointed out to others, you have no knowledge of my present domestic circumstances.
The wood louse plan was flawed from the start, if CCF had not rejected it then I highly suspect TDC would have done so at the planning stage. I see the face saving has already started. The local elections next year will be interesting, I suspect certain councillors could receive a kick in the ballots.
You are quite right, Crow did live in a council house (but certainly not the one he was born and raised in), despite receiving a salary in excess of £140,000. I'm damn sure social housing wasn't intended for people on that kind of money.
@Mrs C As I said to another poster at the weekend, you have no knowledge of my present domestic arrangements.
@Likeablerat Vickery is a politician and therefore subject to scrutiny, he has also been the lead Councillor driving forward the ill-fated wood louse proposal, which despite what he thinks, will not now go forward. In my opinion he deserves all the flak which comes his way for trying to impose his folly on the town.
That's it then, the money for the wood louse is not forthcoming and never will be, and despite what Vickery's imagination tells him, the majority of consultation respondents did NOT want it blighting the lawn. Yet again his pipe dream has gone up in smoke. It's just as well that Vickery has publicly stated he is unlikely to stand for re-election next year because after this fiasco it is highly ...