General Discussion
I thought i read somewhere that Martin Wrigley had resigned
BBC article - Traders launch bid to stop town improvement scheme The traders of Queen Street Newton Abbot do not want the street pedestrianised. It is causing a loss of trade. Why is our MP Martin Wrigley against the traders? His job is to represent his constituents interests and concerns. However he is adamant on ruining their businesses.
Apologies again for the site being slow and unstable these last few days. It turned out it was due to Facebook's crawlers hammering the site. I will be making a few changes over the next 24 hours but the site should still be up and running. You may get signed out again every now and then, so sorry about that and it's OK to just sign back in. Technical details are here for anyone that wants ...
Think you're brave enough to take on our tree top high ropes course? Test your balance on a series of tightropes, rickety bridges and challenging obstacles before zip lining back to ground. Click here to book your session now and swing by Cofton Holidays.
Thank you Webmaster. I had noticed that there was something wrong like last time it happened.
Apologies if you are having difficulties connecting or are getting signed out. This is due to a lot of activity crashing some services. I've increased resources so that should help.
@Steve Excuse me, 'should' and 'shouldn't' sounds like dictating. You googled the terms 'global scientific community' thinking it was some over-arching evil organization based on your own deep mistrust and paranoia. 'Humans don't cause weather', is that your final word? Thank flip for that.
I'm not dictating. You said yourself you meant the scientific community and not the community you originally wrote that doesn't exist. I never said anything about having O Levels or GCSEs. Climate alarmists always resort to ad hominem attacks. Sorry, but humans don't cause the weather. Bye.
@Steve I shouldn't have written anything any differently. You don't dictate anything to me, just because you're either confused or paranoid. You're just trying to save face because you look foolish. Climate change wasn't given the anthropogenic prefix from the beginning of research into it anyway - that'd be predetermined and poor science, nor was the term 'anthropocene' it came later and was ...
You should have originally said scientific community. You wouldn't call an area of scientific study 'anthropogenic climate change' because you would be implying the cause of the phenomenon you were trying to study. I realise people do that, which is another reason to be highly skeptical of work with that phrase in it. Who doesn't understand science these days? It's basically taught from school.