General Discussion
ooooooooooooooh!!!!!!! am 6 feet tall I am physically fit I am a force to be reckoned with I just hope I am right, see you soon
I'd also question whether or not the infrastructure of Dawlish could cope with a further 750 (approx) new residents. Good point. You see Roy we do sometimes agree.
PJD, Well Said, How many times to do people have to hear THERE ARE NO TECHNICALITES IN LAW as proved when Judge Farmer, Totnes Crown Court said NOT GUILTY. That road was always 40mph until Devon Safety Partnership realised that it was the perfect money making site, have you noticed they have never been back.If it was and is such a dangerous road, why not.
"i still know that i have many like minded people here in Dawlish. I doubt that very much, and not one has agreed with you here, or if they do they have not posted which I am sure they would. There are persons on this forum who have strong opinions and I respect them for that. I have never been abusive to you even though you cannot say the same. Have good life.
Any inflamed comments and abuse have come from you, the truth has come from others. I will be very pleased not to see your ridiculous comments anymore. Your vendetta against PH has controlled your posts, and I think I know who you are, see you later, you can prove me wrong by ignoring me when I say hello. Bye Bye for now.
Roy, Pasted from the paper "Teignbridge Council's planning boss Steve Robinson has recommended a proposal by Cavanna Homes and Bovis Homes for a new housing development in Secmaton Lane is refused because it does not have enough affordable homes. I think he has a point,dont you?
Best of luck guys
FEL699 commented "peter harry, take on a cause that affects us all eh? I am sure the 3.000 people who got their money back, points removed from licences, insurance premiums went down, their criminal records expunged from the illegal site at Starcross were happy, and suprise suprise it was infront of Judge Farmer, I guess he was wrong too? I have no problem when the law is properly enforced, but ...
You really are a confused person, just for clarification I read the posts here and NOT ONE PERSON SUEGGESTED THERE WERE TECHNICALITIES. What has been said is there are no technicalites in law, you can make up all sorts of silly scenarios, but if you broke the law then you need to be taken to court and if proved, found guilty if not then not guilty. FEL699 comments I thought there were no ...
This what you have just said " I wonder if Peter would be so smug if he had been before a district judge? How many times do you have to be told, that he did appear before a Judge 19th June 09, Exeter Crown Court. I agree that magistrates do not fully understand the law, that is why you have Clerk to the Justices who are fully qualified lawyers and advise the magistrates. PJD, I agree with ...
