General Discussion
And still the bullying continues...
And if our representatives hadn't have applied for this last-in-a-lifetime funding, then I'm sure that the same old moaning ostriches would have been demanding why they didn't! You've quickly forgotten that of those who took part in the consultation, more preferred what you call a folly than preferred either of the other two options. Despite the fact that from those that preferred the ...
Thanks for the link Roberta.
Not to forget this Sandycott character who appeared on 22 July, and whose 2 posts have both been a dig at me. Trolling is against the T&Cs is it not? These multiple account holders are, happily, oh-so-obvious.
CAPS LOCK! I've apologised for the error of getting the two Larges mixed up. Without wishing to sound like SMELLA, this bullying from you and those sheep that have agreed with (but failed to post a comment about) your posting goes against the T&Cs of the website. Anyway, even I make mistakes sometimes. Not very often granted...
Oh and thanks Pete (or whatever your alias is this week).
Thanks Roberta. Apologies for the confusion. My opinion re his quotes in last weeks paper stand, and as for the letters in this weeks edition, well I've never read so much ill-informed twaddle by so many people in such a small space. Anyway, I've deleted my earlier post, even though my lawyer fears that I may be too late to have avoided the professional screenshotters...
...for 600-ish people of Dawlish...
Pete, you sound very familiar to Onaport (who became a short-lived Jon), and others before him who suddenly stopped posting and then re-appeared under new names shortly afterwards. Andysport and others have asked reasonable questions. You only provide unreasonable non-answers. You're nothing but a troll so please leave it be. Thanks.
Pete, do you happen to know the Food Hygiene Rating for the New Pirates Chest, as I genuinely can't find it online. Maybe I should direct that at Eugene thinking about it. Anyone in fact, as it is a genuine enquiry.
