General Discussion
Just checked TDC's planning portal. There is now a response from the RSPB. Here is an extract (my emphasis in bold). "Paragraph 5.2.9 says that recreation impacts on European wildlife sites “will be mitigated via the standard Joint Interim Approach contribution of £350 per house plus nearby provision of 8ha/1,000 new residents of ...SANGS. This is deemed unlikely to be ...
the planning reference for this project is 12/01491/FUL Click on this link http://gis.teignbridge.gov.uk/TeignbridgePlanningOnline/Results.aspx?Type=Application&Refval=12/01491/FUL and then click on associated documents (see bottom left of page) to see all the documentation.
According to this newspaper report the question and answer concerned inheritance tax. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/george-osborne-advises-viewer-on-how-to-avoid-inheritance-tax-on-the-daily-politics-show-10050347.html With regard to assigning homes to children I found this which gives some general info ...
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/watch-george-osborne-advise-people-how-to-avoid-tax
Thanks for that clarification. And perhaps another thing to bear in mind is that, as I understand it, TDC has to have SANGS in place before they can legally give planning permission for all this new house building to take place (or at some point they have to have the SANGS in place). So, as long as TDC want SANGS at Warren Farm, and as long as that issue isn't resolved then at some point the ...
I think, from what I have observed of the planning system so far, is that what a PI would approve (or not) is determined by this or that planning regs (Shutterton Park appeal being a case in point). So that what any particular landowner/the general public would want to be approved (or not) and what planning regs say should be approved (or not) are far from being the same thing. And as you and I ...
Yes I can see that difference Michael but my point is this: if, because of European and British planning legislation, they (TDC) have to protect such areas as the Exe Estuary and the Warren NNR from human visitors then either that legislation trumps all others or it doesn't. I can't get my head around the fact that TDC says it has to have a SANGS at Warren Farm in order to stop/detract people ...
@Woolbrook . Quite so. TDC planners must have a logic of some kind that they are following to recommend that one planning application encouraging visitors to the Warren and the Exe Estuary be approved whilst another, having the same effect, be refused. There was a very recent planning application to turn part of the public toilets at the Warren into a seasonal bike hire shop. (14/0354/FUL). ...
Update (for those interested). See my post of 19th Jan. timed at 13.21 I did indeed send an e-mail to Cllr Goodey asking him for answers to questions concerning the "deemed not to be required" statement. However, here we are some 20 working days or so later and I have yet to receive an acknowledgement let alone a full response to my e-mail. So, I have sent him a reminder e-mail this ...
@Margaret Swift - Margaret, as you are on the steering group and you also post on here could you tell us please how the steering group envisages engaging with the Dawlish public? I have heard that the steering group members will each lead a working party concerned with one particular policy of the Neighbourhood Plan. Is that correct? Any other info would also be very useful as I cannot ...
