General Discussion
@Webmaster "when you address someone they have a right to respond" I have never disputed this. "Also, as this is a public forum, anyone can respond to your posts, and you don't get to choose who." Again I have never disputed this. "If you want a restricted discussion where you can choose who posts, you can create a group. This site still has this functionality. The ...
@TRB, when you address someone they have a right to respond. Also, as this is a public forum, anyone can respond to your posts, and you don't get to choose who. If you want a restricted discussion where you can choose who posts, you can create a group. This site still has this functionality.
This is very relevant for the Dawlish area, take a look what do you think? SDA represent an alternative to the Lib Dem-Tory norm that just isn't working/ #2 Stop Over-Development From the SDA Website http://southdevonalliance.org/News20.html Westminster's National Planning Policy Framework uses an equation to work out how many houses we need. It takes no account of our ...
@Webmaster That's not a question and I wasn't awaiting any response. So in answer to your question it's clearly the former. I have no intention of continuing any communication with @Lynne or on any matter that isn't relevant to the thread subject with anyone else.
@TRB, the final paragraph. It's not a question as such, but it is addressed to Lynne.
I asked the webmaster publicly on this thread to adjudicate. Thank you webmaster for doing so.
@Webmaster Which question are you referring to? Other people on this website have written far worse than 'back off'. I would've preferred as Webmaster, if you had replied to my message privately rather than on this thread.
@TRB, just because you don't like what Lynne has to say doesn't mean her comments are irrelevant. She has every right to comment here as it is a public forum. So which is it? Do you want Lynne to back off or do you want her to answer the question you just asked her after telling her to back off? Also, please do not tell other users to back off. That is not acceptable on here.
@Lynne I reported you for Irrelevance, your comment was nothing to do with the topic. You have no intention in engaging in any discussion about the topic in the title namely Carol Vorderman being the face of tactical voting site Stop The Tories and how that site favours Labour now locally. You've not given an alternative view to the many reasons I have written about for not voting for Lib Dem ...
@Lynne you aren't in breach of anything, and yes, you are right about views. It would be useful to have that metric but it isn't easily obtainable at the moment. But from the daily overall page views (summarised below for the last 3 days), the ratio of views to users is around 6 if that helps. Date Users Page Views 19/06/2024 211 1512 18/06/2024 ...