This site uses cookies

General Discussion

268
9
Paul
Paul
21 Oct 2019 12:08

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum

Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term satellite record to map sea ice extent in the late 1970s.

This is a NASA article from 2014, however it needs highlighting as it cancels 'the climate crisis'.

1 Agree
ER113
ER113
21 Oct 2019 13:23

"Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term satellite record to map sea ice extent in the late 1970s.

This is a NASA article from 2014, however it needs highlighting as it cancels 'the climate crisis'"

 

Maybe just reading the whole article and hearing what the scientists have to say might, maybe, alter your view. Nothing in it suggests we cancel the view that we have a climate crisis.

3 Agrees
Paul
Paul
21 Oct 2019 15:23

It would do if there were some facts backing it up.

I agree that pollution is wrong, however the BBC often talks about the sea level rising, but we know that it has not change at all. The sea is exactly the same has it has been for many years.

Making up facts does not help.

ER113
ER113
22 Oct 2019 17:02

Facts and evidence are interesting things indeed.

 

May I suggest that you watch trhe attached video and listen to what is said. I note that you say that there has been no change in the sea level as, " we know it has not changed at all". Really? How do we know this?

1 Agree
FredBassett
FredBassett
23 Oct 2019 12:22

Here's a fact "Climate Change" is naturally occuring and has been going on for millions of years. The difference today, is that several large companies, charities, and individual doom and gloom merchants, oh and not forgetting the great unwashed Libdem snowflakes have seen a way to make vast sums of money out of it. Yes pollution is wrong but the causes need to be categorized according to the harm these pollutants actually do to the environment. One of the largest air pollutors are natural volcanos apparently, so I would personally like to witness any extinction rebelion members trying to stop one of those errupting, and would encourage them to do so. On which subject would just like to remind any ER members that you currently owe the British tax payers approx £37 million for policing your London demo's.

 

9 Agrees
ER113
ER113
24 Oct 2019 11:48

Might I also point you towards a web site that addresses something like 135 issues related to climate change.

 

The site is https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

1 Agree
ER113
ER113
24 Oct 2019 11:50

Actuall my estimate was wrong. There are 197 issues that are considered.

 

I hope the study of these issues helps.

 

2 Agrees
Paul
Paul
25 Oct 2019 07:11

Well I've not any evidence at all. As Fred says it's just a money maker. Simple.

4 Agrees
ER113
ER113
28 Oct 2019 17:36

No, not simple. presumably if it was simple then we would not be having this discussion at all.

We are having this debate because the material is showing some people how serious is teh current situation

I had hoped you might take the trouble to read a few of the entries in the website above. They might, perhaps, enable you to see what scientists have been saying for many years.

Or, put another way, offer up some evidence that obviously you want.

4 Agrees
Comment Please sign in or sign up to post