This is the new thinking by the government, though how many of the new builds in the last 5-10 years in Dawlish have been bungalows? As far as I can see it is flats and houses crammed in as tight as possible to maximise return. If more bungalows were built would it encourage older people to move out of larger family homes? Some say older people want to live in flats as it is less work and less maintenance, but is this true or is this the line spun by the greedy developers? I love the thought of a bungalow with a nice garden to sit in surrounded by other bungalows or challet bungalows, but would a developer actually go with that or the council who don't want low density let it go through? It will be interesting to see how Teignbridge Council deal with this when it becomes part of the planning guidance. The same goes for self builds, what builders truely want them on site! Just a thought.
Mr Boles believes that new bungalows could help to solve the housing crisis by encouraging older people to move out of bigger homes and make way for younger families.
Critics have previously warned that planning rules which have forced developers to build at least 30 dwellings per hectare had acted as a disincentive towards new bungalows by focusing on high density developments.
This meant that in 2009 only 300 bungalows were built in this country, and that currently only two per cent of the country’s homes are bungalows.
Mr Boles indicated that developments containing bungalows may face less local opposition.
“Bungalows are not a universal panacea, but they are very popular and therefore if you have land in your neighbourhoods and you propose to allocate it specifically to bungalows I think you’ll find that those site allocations are some of the more popular ones that you make,” Mr Boles added.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/31/in-praise-bungalows
Please