This site uses cookies

General Discussion

Around The Courts

270
22
General Discussion
General Discussion
07 Mar 2012 16:47

After several complaints about the 'Around the Courts' thread I have decided to remove it. Although I try not to remove posts if I can help it, this thread was clearly upsetting individuals and did not serve any purpose other than to be vindictive. I hope everyone is OK with this.

Brazilnut
Brazilnut
07 Mar 2012 16:56

I think that is very sensible of you Webmaster. It was a very nasty thread anyway and was not a discussion point Im sure hedgehog69 will be very pleased

J.Warrener
J.Warrener
07 Mar 2012 16:57

No not really , why was it vindictive as the information was availible in the papers. Not exactly impartial.

Brazilnut
Brazilnut
07 Mar 2012 17:00

it goes in the paper and people can read it , but not discuss it on an open forum, it was causing distress to one person I know and although the outcome is listed the full circumstances are not.

jools88
jools88
07 Mar 2012 17:08

Nelson
Nelson
07 Mar 2012 17:22

Dear Webmaster. Am I allowed to paste future cases (where the defendant is found guilty or pleads guilty) from the newspaper website onto the News section of your website? No discussion, no commentary, just public interest facts. Thanks.

jools88
jools88
07 Mar 2012 17:32

NO

General Discussion
General Discussion
07 Mar 2012 17:46

@J Warrener,

The information from the newspaper article(s) was not vindictive. It had been on here for a couple of weeks. Nelson's intention was soley to cause a conflict or argument which is against the forum terms.

@Nelson,

Any member can post news articles on here. The same terms apply.

Don Pearson
Don Pearson
07 Mar 2012 17:52

@webmaster

I have no problems with the way you exercise your judgement over the forum. It is obvious that you think carefully before you make your decisions.

Don

General Discussion
General Discussion
07 Mar 2012 18:26

Thanks Don. Having thought about it further, I have recovered the thread, left it closed and redacted the name of the person that was being discussed on there.

The reason for this is because when people read the threads on here in the future, it is not very helpful to find a thread missing, particularly when another thread has popped up that is discussing it.

jools88
jools88
07 Mar 2012 19:17

nelson wins again.

Brazilnut
Brazilnut
07 Mar 2012 19:28

seems that way!!!!!!!!!!!

General Discussion
General Discussion
07 Mar 2012 19:49

Sorry Jools88 & Brazilnut. A lot of people had contributed to the thread and posted comments that were not vindictive including comments about why this type of discussion should not be pursued.

I think the approach of closing a thread and redacting parts if necessary is probably better than removing threads.

Brazilnut
Brazilnut
07 Mar 2012 20:14

ok understand

jools88
jools88
07 Mar 2012 20:18

still think you should do something about nelson. not a team player is he ?

General Discussion
General Discussion
07 Mar 2012 20:35

I have exchanged emails with Nelson so hopefully he will be more of a team player from now on.

jools88
jools88
07 Mar 2012 20:43

Thank you . we can only hope can't we.

Nelson
Nelson
07 Mar 2012 21:32

Thanks for replying to my emails Webmaster.

jools88
jools88
07 Mar 2012 21:48

What ever.

neilh
neilh
07 Mar 2012 23:53

Well done webmaster. Hedgehog69 was obviously very distressed and I believe that that is a totally unacceptable outcome in what should be a helpful and informative discussion forum.

hedgehog69
hedgehog69
08 Mar 2012 17:24

ty webmaster and for stopping the post,

hedgehog69
hedgehog69
08 Mar 2012 17:26

ty webmaster and for stopping the post,

Comment Please sign in or sign up to post