User 4549
Joey you say - I personally doubt that a CRB checked ( so was Huntley ) CCTV operator would be so unscrupulous as to zoom - my opinion is the camera should not be in placed in a position where temptation may prove too much. I suggest you get the complete 18 page report it is critical of just about everything to do with the CCTV that cost £80.000 +. for six cameras and Teignmouth are investigating ...
This has been pasted from an 18 page report which is quite damning of the whole system that they spent your and my money on, you can get a a full copy of the report from the Town Hall --------------------------------------------- Physical review of the cameras coverage and capability did reveal some electronic 'privacy' masking concerns Example: Tucks Plot [Holiday Flats & private residents] ...
Dont forget they wasted £80.000 and the costs are ongoing and rising, for CCTV that do not see at night and do not pan automatically even though they record 24 hours a day. That cost cannot have helped regarding the council tax increase
Did you all see the ridiculous comments made by the Mayor in the Dawlish Gazette January 2, She said ' Crime was a huge issue among residents long before I became a councillor six years ago and when we went to the polls we did so saying CCTV was something we wanted to explore' She forgot to mention that the polls from 1.000 people ( 200 were tourists ) only 2-1/2% even mentioned cameras, thats ...
Chipping would be a good idea, I believe we know how they disappeared but cannot prove it.
Is it not time Dawlish Town Council, Town Clerk & the Duck warden stopped blaming dogs for the loss of Black Swans when they can't even get the figures right. J Winchester says 12 in the last 18 months (Express & Echo)In the Town crier the new Mayor Prowse states 4, then we have the new Duck Warden who says 5 have been lost to dog attacks. Not one of these people have ever provided proof and the ...
