Margaret Swift
Three agrees...........Michael, Bob and Mrjrcp?
Oh, give it a rest!
Well, we can tell the local elections are looming!
It will!
@Mrs C, read your own post, I rest my case as a resident of Dawlish! I am, along with two other conscientious councillors, in the process of analysing the results of the survey and your statement is not accurate, as well you know. I won't bore people by citing the figures again as they were widely publicised last August but, as we all know, the combined figure of those against the monstrosity and ...
As a member of the working group I have not seen any photographs submitted so I have asked about the process for sharing submissions to ensure this is a fair and equitable process.
It is sad when people denigrate the black swan emblem of Dawlish. We are unique in having the black swan as an emblem so let us celebrate it on ONE banner perhaps. Yes let's be inspirational but not to the extent of alienating people such as happened with the dreadful proposal for the Woodlouse on the lawn last year!
Please Mrjrpc, do not try to detract from the fact that you would prefer to dismiss homophobic comments. I asked a question and you explained that you did not have time to retype the clause and for me that was an end to the query. Mrs C is the person on here who constantly stirs things up, as she has done in this post. Put the blame where it belongs please.
Well anyone with an ounce (or is that a gram?) of intelligence would know that the phrase I used is not derogatory but I do think you should go and read Dorian's post again. Homophobic language should never be dismissed as nonsense and should always be challenged.
This is so annoying! You cannot copy and paste from the document Mcjrpc is referring to but I assume he or she is referring to the SANGS not being required. Well why don't you just say so instead of referring to a document Etc Etc!! Or is it that you would prefer to remain anonymous and not queer your pitch for the next election?
