Lynne
Teignbridge District Council are needing to save more money and to this end they are looking at how the public toilet provision within the district can be revamped. Scroll down this link to find more info. http://www.teignbridge.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=38755&p=0 With regard to Dawlish and the Warren the following is the suggested course of action: Dawlish Retain the toilets ...
And there was I wanting to ask you for your definition of 'secondary school discussion'. And who decides who knows what they are talking about and who does not? And who decides what knowledge is needed before a 'valid' opinion can be reached? And who decides what a 'valid' opinion is? And..............? And............? And...........? Get my drift?
@b.o.liking seconded. @HM2 I'll use whatever abbreviations I choose.
So.......are you saying that it is wrong for CWs to be used deliberately but okay for them to be a cause of death if they are released as a result of the Americans hitting a target where they (the Americans) are pretty certain they are stored?
Just wondering if a possible outcome of missile strikes on places where CWs are kept, might be that the CWs are released into the environment?
In one of my earlier postings, I gave a link which showed the names of the Tory MPs who voted against the goverment last Thursday. The reason I posted that link was because one of those MPs was our MP, Anne Marie Morris. In her column in today's Dawlish Gazette she outlines her reasons for voting the way she did. Here is what she says: "The attention of both Westminster and the wider ...
When I mentioned NATO I didn't mean it, as an organisation, should get involved in the Syrian civil war rather why the US always seems to look to the UK rather than any other individual NATO country to get involved in whatever it, the US, is militarily wanting to get involved in. Why us and not any other country is what I am trying to get at. And I deffo remember France being referred as ...
I'd expect support from all the NATO countries (and vice versa). Are you saying that the US would only come to our aid if we had previously given it our unconditional support in whatever military interventions it had gotten itself involved in? It just seems to me that the UK is expected to go along with the US., Whatever. Period. Why not any of the other NATO countries? Or, as previous ...
I'm still trying to figure out why, if the US wanted us to be involved in military action and such military action would be as effective (or not?) in four weeks time as it would have been last weekend, why was Obama in such a rush to get the UK onside last week? And.......it seems that not all in the US are in favour of military action. Obama may have made a unilateral decision to go ...
On the other hand it might also be the case that David Cameron's great rush to get parliament's backing for his planned course of military action was the cause of his losing the debate on Thursday. He sowed the seeds of his own defeat. This Mail article is political spin. The Mail is a tory supporting newspaper. So of course it will point the finger of blame at Ed Milliband. And talking ...
