Erm, the last paragraph is an utter fabrication. Whoever you are.
See what I mean? Yet more lies from the NIMBY brigade.
LOL!
That smartwatch of yours has a great zoom. Not an innuendo, by the way...
Well, I apologise for having an opinion that causes you to wish to shout me down with your bullyboy tactics. My voice isn't about being "Mightier than thou" or even "Holier than thou", it's about correcting those who have an agenda that is full of lies, deceit, innuendo and misinformation. One thing though, why have you changed your username from ALLEMS? Which a number of us know was a new ...
The same consultation which revealed that 64% didn't want a Victorian bandstand and 80% didn't want the present carbuncle that sadly we're now stuck with. However Bernie, you might be surprised to learn that I otherwise agree with you. Your sister will have even more time on her hands after next May... Why haven't you replied to the Councillors who have disproven your false claims about ...
That'd be the consultation that helped people to understand the implications of the proposal, and to therefore vote for the cultural pavilion in preference to either a Victorian bandstand or the present carbuncle remaining as is...
That's right Roberta. The sign I've seen says that the end of February date is weather permitting.
Two are definitely due to appear, and the work is scheduled to be completed by the end of February.
Stephen. I'd imagine that making the railway wall much higher would only be effective (in terms of damage prevention) if it was also made much much wider. Please note that the railway wall isn't the same thing as the seawall.