Lynne
I cannot prove what I am about to say (because I am not privy to town council emails) but I don't doubt for one moment that the proverbial manure has been/is/and will be hitting the fan because of this petition and most, if not all, of the manure will be going in the direction of Cllr Foden. So......if you support the petition/have concerns etc about the original consultation it might be ...
Well that whimsy of yours (about AF going to the Gazette) could easily be interpreted as being a statement of fact. And can you prove what you say about my being big mates with Alison Foden or is that yet another whimsy of yours? From the terms and conditions of use of this website: You agree, through your use of Dawlish.com, that you will not post any material which is knowingly ...
Re your last sentence DM. Do you have any proof to substantiate that allegation?
To all those who have concerns about the format of the original questionnaire and how the answers to that format were subsequently used to argue for a playpark on the lawn. Whilst I do not know, and am in no way involved in, the editorial decision of what gets published and what does not get published in the Gazette I feel pretty sure that the recent petition set up by Alison Foden may ...
I've been away for a while and have had restricted access to emails which may account for the fact that I missed reading this response from an officer at TDC sent to me the day after my letter was published in the Gazette. Here is part of the TDC email response. It gives answers to my questions of 1) who owns the countryside park and 2) who would be paying for its maintenance. It seems that ...
In the latest Dawlish Post, in the public notices section found on page 72, can be found the following; " Notice is hereby given etc etc that TDC intends to dispose of an interest in two areas of open space at the following locations: Pavilion at Forde Park, Newton Abbot and Site between Brunswick Place and Dawlish Water, Dawlish (approx 284 square metres) by way of a 5 year ...
But others may well have been interested in the questions I asked and the answers that were given.
@ the end of the working day today - 19 working days ago. I also asked who would be paying for the country park's running costs. I haven't had an answer yet. I thought it a simple and straight forward question which would therefore be simple and straight forward to answer ie within 5 working days. But it would seem not.
for info. This is what the automated response message said . My highlights in bold. "Thank you for your message, which was received today. This mailbox is checked on a daily basis during office hours and your message will be passed to the most appropriate officer. If a response is required, we will endeavour to contact you within 5 working days but if your enquiry requires ...
@D. Mond. going off subject. You might think Cllr Clemens' response was robust. I thought he said exactly what I had expected him to say.
