Discussion
So, Indy Scott, you are vehemently anti Tory and apparently not too keen on the Lib dems? Your political allegence is your business, but, we could possibly be kindred spirits? The email trail that I have posted was predominately to help set the record straight regarding the resignations of John and Linda Petherick, I'm confident that you will agree that another Councillor should not have ...
Presumably, falsehoods going out in print would be potentially libellous.
I agree with Lynne, Councillor Prowse needs to justify her comments about falsehoods going out in print. Perhaps someone could email her and ask for clarification then let the rest of us know.
7.00pm BTW If it appears that I have not responded to any other questions of yours it's probably because you have edited your posts after my having initially read them. Nothing wrong with editing or adding to posts of course, as I am doing exactly the same thing now. Tedious - because I felt I was having to repeat myself. I don't intend doing it anymore.
What time? I'd try to talk to them, one of them runs away from me though. why tedious? most of what i wrote was for @Likeablerat , now there's resounding silence.
This is now getting tedious. As I have said, several times now, until any of us know what it is that Cllr Prowse had in mind when she wrote of falsehoods going out in print then none of us know whether there is any truth in it or not. May be even Cllr Wrigley doesn't know what she is referring to and if he doesn't know what she is referring to how can he possibly comment? Tell you what. ...
threads do wander, have you never questioned a thread going off tangeant @Lynne ? but this one has been hijacked by the lib dems it should concern 2 decent former independent councillors. it's not even subtle. By all means expose the Tories, but please have something with more substance to base a credible argument on if trying to take them on; a credible figurehead would help too.
"The title of this thread is 'Would You Like To Know Why The Two Dawlish Councillors Resigned' - why is it now about Cllr Wrigley being 'discredited'?" Because threads wander off topic quite often? If readers of this thread wish to contact any of the councillors mentioned in the email trail then they will know how to do so. But I expect all you will get is a resounding silence from ...
Perhaps? Right oh. So Cllr Clatworthy and Cllr Hockin may or may not feel discredited by falsehoods that have gone to print and are linked to Cllr Wrigley according to Cllr Prowse. Have they stated that they feel discredited? Has anyone heard anything form Cllr Wrigley? Has he claimed he feels discredited at all? someone on here called @Likeablerat claims wrigley ...
Perhaps Cllr Wrigley is being discredited by way of Cllr Prowse implying that Cllr Wrigley has made false statements in print. But she does not give an example of what she means. So perhaps she should be asked to enlighten us and then we could all decide for ourselves. And should Cllr Wrigley indeed end up being mayor it will be interesting to see if Cllr Clatworthy (if re-elected) and ...