This site uses cookies

Mcjrpc

Mcjrpc's Posts

I don't know who these people are either.   What's the big deal?  Providing they are acting for the good of Dawlish and abstain from decisions that benefit themselves that's fine by me.  We need people with commercial insight otherwise you end up with parochial types trying to hamper progress.  If however Fred or Margaret are suggesting that there is a conflict of interest in how they conduct ...

17 Feb 2015

No cycling - I get why it needs to be like that but I do think it's a shame - Dawlish would see more visitors if they could cycle in along the flat. Come to think of it,  soon it'll all be on one level with a puncture-free concrete section, might even flout it myself.

17 Feb 2015

So just clothes?  Am surprised.  I'm not their target market but I'd have thought better food concessions would improve the offering to visitors.  I might be inclined to spend money if there was more than pub grub or a bag of chips on offer.   (That's just my commercial opinion, if the owners want clothes, it's up to them). Happy to hear about the cycle hire although I wonder how long it ...

17 Feb 2015

@Michael do you know what mix of retail products are intended?   Have any other parties previously tried and failed to get planning permission for the site?

Was the question about avoiding inheritance tax liability or assigning your home to your children while you're still in good health to avoid the cost of a care home later on?  With the latter, it's not a fat cat device, 'ordinary' people do it to deprive themselves of a means tested asset.  Their children are up for it because their inheritance doesn't get eroded.

I agree with you Margaret, but it's hardly an insightful observation deserving of such self-congratulation!

Hope they take it to a vet who will know if it's microchipped.

Enforced absence?  Was it at the pleasure of Her Majesty then?

Would be interested to know if any of our Town Councillors are considering standing for TDC.

The question is not what the issues are but why they weren't resolved as originally promised. The insurance shortfall is a smokescreen, if the money was there they still couldn't do it because they haven't organised it properly.   Not long after the fire I read that the Holmans were pleased with the new plans so what stopped TDC - why wasn't planning permission obtained and the work scheduled? ...