General Discussion
I would suggest that Webmaster merely has to edit your last post to prove who he is!
The above post and the most recent other one calling people "vermin" is exactly why this forum should be excluded to non-members. I don't know how to post green text on here (as per the first post in this thread), so I for one am most definitely not "Webmaster". I think the phrase that comes to mind is "hanging by ones own petard".
I'll ask you for a third time. Based upon the evidence presented to you, do you think that "Dullish" is a Dawlish-hater? I don't know why you think that my question refers to you, unless of course....
The previous post was from me, of course.
Based upon the evidence, do you not think that "Dullish" is a Dawlish hater? A simple and very pertinent question for you. No deflections necessary.
Not before time. It's a pity that you don't publish the IP addresses too. I'm all for healthy debate, but there are one or two people on here that do nothing but slag off Dawlish. They don't even live here. They do not engage in intelligent debate, they ignore pertinent questions, they just copy and paste the same inane hatred left, right and centre. Going to members only will also stop the ...
"Malfeascence"? Hmm, I wonder who else uses that word on here? Fool. "Dullish" is the Dawlish hater who posts on here as Anon, slagging off the town that we live in (but he doesn't). For example this is what he posted on the 'General' forum earlier this year, in reply to a lady making a genuine request about coming on holiday to Dawlish: "I wouldn't bother with Dawlish.....Teignmouth and Shaldon ...
So transparent. Fool. Won't post as Dullish/Roy/Viaduct, but will post as Anon. Fool.
What a fool. "Dullish" posts on the General forum slagging off Dawlish, forced out of hiding due to having to sign in to post. Yet strangely he hasn't posted on the Backyard forum at all recently. Though of course he has, because we all know that he's the Anon fool. So transparent. Fool.
Admit you were wrong. Fool.