General Discussion
instead of just ckicking 'agree' on @roberta silly comment, how about posting a sensible response? The majority of people support the benefits system changes. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/435918/Majority-support-benefits-cuts-saying-find-a-job-or-work-harder
There are severe problems with the UK's benefits system as Channel 4's programme 'Benefit Street' clearly showed. Many of the people on that street were capable of work but had absolutely no intention of working. This is simply wrong and unfair on others working and paying high taxes. A simple comparsion between the UK and China shows why we have such a budget problem. Here people don't need to ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/10647538/Cutting-benefits-part-of-a-moral-mission-Cameron-tells-new-Cardinal.html David Cameron is absolutely right to reduce the benefit dependency culture that the Labour Party have created.
I agree, the customer service is awful there. They always keep you waiting for ages to get served and it is frustrating and irritating. The last time I went there, the lady behind the counter was on the phone to someone for quite some time when eventually another member of staff turned up. However, he just looked around and then walked off.
All good ideas. So perhaps we could have boulder islands in the sea like at Sidmouth and a sea wall like the curved one at Teignmouth but taller and flood gates at the viaduct. Also re-instate the groyns to retain/build up more sand on the beach. And on a related issue automatic sluice gates in the wears of the brook which open when there is a lot of water rushing down. Image source: ...
If the railway was re-routed in land, Dawlish would be in serious difficulties. We can't even afford to run a few public toilets. However it will never be re-routed. @Carer , I totally agree with your sidmouth style defences idea. That is the only answer. Image source: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1010491
There are supposed to be rail replacement buses, however they are very few and far between. Best not to chance it anyway as you could get stuck.
Not sure what your point is, but I'm all for helping people in genuine need. What I can't stand is the people who choose not to work and also are not able to support themselves. It doesn't matter if it costs the tax payer £10B or £1 it is still wrong.
Yep I can't stand the tax payers money going on people who choose not to work. As for aid for people being persecuted, we should do as much as we can.
What several of you are saying, is charity begins at home and there it stops. Unbelievable! We all have so much in this country, you didn't earn a place in this land of plenty, you were just born here. We have nice warm houses, computers, cars, mobile phones, TVs, etc. There are many millions of people around the world that don't have any food. Can't even afford a sandwich. It is ...
