General Discussion
The irony of this thread...
Yes Bernard I do understand what happened in the budgets of 97 and 98. This pretty little head of mine is capable of understanding finance, you condescending saddo. I'm not going to argue with you as you're beneath contempt.
Employers were responsible for the closure of final salary pensions, not Browns actions of 1997/98.
I feel embarrassed. Like a scene from Purdah She Wrote.
Often better to do a little research to prevent embarrassing oneself...
Thanks Ken. I've read the paper version and I genuinely appreciate Sue taking the time to eloquently put across the Carnival companys point of view. However we all know that help has been offered and rejected because those offering help aren't friends of the family.
Exactly Lynne. The reasons for refusal of the Teignmouth version are planning-related. One can't just say that one doesn't like the look of it. Hopefully enough people will send in objections to this and hopefully the powers that be will make the right decision.
Can't wait to read that when I get home tonight!
Comments on the portal have to be planning related, sadly we can't just say that it's hideous.
Not totally irrelevant, but Mr Nance is a member of the Scientology cult. I won't call it a religion.
