This site uses cookies

Judith Chalmers

Judith Chalmers' Posts

If sea levels rise to that extent, there won't be a Dawlish to avoid!

...

11 Dec 2014

The second lot of horses that I thought I saw in the distance are actually donkeys! Is that what they mean by biodiversity? SoD, did you manage to dig up anything related to mobile homes not being allowed to be stored on the old Seaways?

11 Dec 2014

Mcjrpc. I'm not saying that it proves anything. However if these empty fields form one third of Farmer Weeks' estate, what's happening on the other two thirds? SoD. I've now had a look at the second set of plans that you've found. There's still no reference to mobile homes (even unoccupied ones!) - only tourers and tents. There's also this gem in the decision notice: "Whilst the site ...

11 Dec 2014

Strolling further down Warren Road, I've found a field backing onto the hotel that's got a couple or three dozen sheep in it!! And another with a couple of horses...

11 Dec 2014

I'm currently stood at the gates to Warren Farm. And I can't see any livestock. In fact all I can see is arable (non food producing) green fields. And a horse. There must be some mistake. Maybe I signed a petition to save a working farm somewhere else?

11 Dec 2014

Apology accepted SoD.

11 Dec 2014

SoD. Have another look at the clearly defined geographical area of the planning application you refer to. That area, and ergo the conditions of what is and what is not included, doesn't include the location of these temporarily placed mobile homes which are on the Seaways field nearest to Warren Road.  Try again.

11 Dec 2014

Well SoD, I've had a look at the application that you're being so vociferous about, and sadly for you it's got nothing to do with the location where the mobile homes have been temporarily placed. You are on about the mobile homes on the old Seaways site aren't you?  Attention to detail, and all that. If so, have another look at the site map in relation to the actual location before you ...

11 Dec 2014

SoD, I purport to represent nobody but myself! I believe that your issue is not with the land that these are temporarily sited on, but with the surname of the landowners.  You still haven't pointed out where it states anything about mobile homes - if you do then I'll support you (for what it's worth) in your campaign to have them removed - I assume that there'll be a "signme" petition?